Au contraire, we have asked for the microfilm rolls from multiple years including the one that Obama’s is supposed to be in, the paper records for Obama, and the computer transaction logs which will show any tampering with the electronic record.
That’s for the birth certificate. The same things would be required for the other records that have shown signs of tampering (draft registration, SSN, and passport records).
Which is precisely the kind of audit the inspector general for the Dept of Health and Human Services reported to Congress as necessary when even something like a vague seal on a birth certificate shows up - not to mention actual tampering with the records by agency staff, as we’ve seen with EVERY document mentioned above.
See http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf That report was released in September of 2000 - even before 9-11 caused us to look with new eyes at just how vulnerable identity fraud makes this country’s national security.
IOW, this is very, very basic stuff that’s been the accepted standard for a very long time. Kind of like the Rules of Evidence have been in place for a very long time - the rules that Judge Malihi walked all over in order to issue a sharia ruling instead (judge’s knowledge without need for any steenkin’ evidence)...
We’ve been over this all before. I’m not going to spell it all out to you yet again, so this is all I’m going to say here. Anything more is a waste of my time.
Of course the birthers have been asking for evidence. What I said was that they'll reject any evidence they're given if it doesn't support the conspiracy theory.