Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nascarnation; butterdezillion
Those who want Baraq will vote for Baraq and those who don’t, won’t.

Well, they might, IF, he's on their ballot.

20 posted on 08/04/2012 10:55:56 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: ROCKLOBSTER

Yeah Obama might not be on the ballot in some states.

And Salma Hayek might dump her billionaire husband and call me for a date.


22 posted on 08/04/2012 11:02:00 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

And at this point, barring a judicial or administrative procedure in which Obama’s Hawaii birth record (and at this point the microfilms and computer transaction logs as well, since Hawaii has altered official records on this matter already) is presented as evidence, Obama’s placement on any ballot in the country will involve known felonies (perjury and fraud) by the DNC and its lawyer, as well as misprision of those felonies by each state SOS and the HDOH.

Already the Mississipi Democratic Executive Committee requested a “verification” specifically designed to avoid the issue of whether Obama’s true birth facts can be verified. To me, that strongly suggests that MDEC knew that Onaka CAN’T verify any actual birth facts - since they requested a verification without ever submitting the actual APPLICATION for a verification, in order to expressly avoid asking for specific birth facts to be verified as legally true. And they’ve submitted the irrelevant “verification” they received to a judge.

So ALREADY they are trying to lay a foundation showing that they THOUGHT Obama was eligible, even though the way they handled their request strongly suggests they knew darn good and well not to do a request like Ken Bennett did, because Onaka would refuse to verify any true birth facts to them, just like he did to Bennett. And they know the only legal reason for Onaka to refuse to verify the birth facts is if the submitted facts are not legally true.

IOW, they are going to do everything in their power to cover their legal behinds by saying they THOUGHT Obama’s HI BC is legally valid, even though their own actions show they heard Onaka loud and clear when he indirectly confirmed to Ken Bennett that Obama’s HI birth record is legally non-valid. We need to get the truth into their faces, on the record, with proof for all to see.... that they were informed and knew otherwise.


23 posted on 08/04/2012 11:10:08 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson