This is game changing technology.
40 pound projectiles traveling at 8,210 feet per second to ranges of 50-100 nautical miles.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: moonshot925
2 posted on
08/03/2012 6:48:29 AM PDT by
EEGator
To: moonshot925
—8,210 feet per second—
Crap! That’s faster than my Scion!
3 posted on
08/03/2012 6:50:12 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: moonshot925
I think there is a place or two in Iran that they could test these on.
4 posted on
08/03/2012 6:51:12 AM PDT by
DonkeyBonker
(Oppose Senate Amendment S.A. 2575! I need more than 10 rounds in my magazine.)
To: moonshot925
What was that Arnold Schwarzenegger movie that featured that gun that fired the projectile at "near light speed"?
That is what came to my mind.....
5 posted on
08/03/2012 6:52:12 AM PDT by
China Clipper
( Animals? Sure I like animals. See? There they are, right next to the potatoes!)
To: moonshot925
When this is fieldable, it changes the ballance between air and ground units.
This has been in the works for a long time, and is a primary driving force behind the push for the development of small, harder to detect and kill unmanned drones.
8 posted on
08/03/2012 6:54:01 AM PDT by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: moonshot925
10 posted on
08/03/2012 6:54:50 AM PDT by
mikeus_maximus
(I won't vote for Romney, period. Voting for "the lesser of two evils" is still voting for evil.)
To: moonshot925
". . . GPS Controlled Bullets . . ."Now there's an Achilles heal . . .
12 posted on
08/03/2012 6:56:37 AM PDT by
guitar4jesus
(Biofuels, AGW, Globalism, Green Movement -- Strong Delusions! . . . . 2Thes 2:11)
To: moonshot925
Yes, but does it use green energy?.............
15 posted on
08/03/2012 6:59:44 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Think logically. Act normally.................)
To: moonshot925
“........then steer that bad boy around the children smashing matchbox cars in the front yard and hit the right target inside the kitchen window . . . BOOM!”
So whadder they sayin’? Momma better learn to cook?
18 posted on
08/03/2012 7:03:31 AM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: moonshot925
That is 1/3 of the velocity needed to escape the gravity well. with more power and a longer rail we could take out satelites. Of course hitting them might be a little tricky.
19 posted on
08/03/2012 7:04:48 AM PDT by
albionin
(A gawn fit's aye gettin.)
To: moonshot925
40 pound projectiles traveling at 8,210 feet per second to ranges of 50-100 nautical miles. I recall reading elsewhere that these projectiles contain no explosive ordnance. Their destructive power comes from kinetic energy alone. As an Ordnanceman myself, this is interesting in that these projectiles could potentially be stored almost anywhere on a ship safely, rather than a handful of armored, floodable magazines. They could also be handled by many more crewmembers than just ordnance-qualified personnel.
22 posted on
08/03/2012 7:11:32 AM PDT by
Drew68
(I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
To: moonshot925
This will change deer hunting forever.
To: moonshot925
Thanks to the 1.2 million Chinese “diplomats” and “students” currently living in this country you can be sure that the “People's Liberation Army” got the plans for this weapon 15 minutes after they were finalized.
27 posted on
08/03/2012 7:20:36 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Poor Barack.If He's Reelected,Think Of The Mess He'll Inherit!)
To: moonshot925
Yes, a game changer.
These projectiles require no explosives, as the kinetic energy of impact dwarfs the power of any payload. If I’ve done my math correctly, a 40 lb projectile at these speeds has twice the kinetic energy of a 1600 lb shell at conventional speeds.
The magazine capacity of a ship is also much greater, as only the projectile is required. This will double or triple capacity by volume and weight.
This reintroduces the BB battleship as a naval combatant.
There is no defense against these arrows. The only option is to go after the archer.
31 posted on
08/03/2012 7:24:43 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: moonshot925
What navy would not want a two-foot-long GPS-guided bullet?... A navy that cannot afford $40 per gallon 'green' fuel?
36 posted on
08/03/2012 7:28:06 AM PDT by
Minutemen
("It's a Religion of Peace")
To: moonshot925
37 posted on
08/03/2012 7:28:16 AM PDT by
TheCause
("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
To: moonshot925
They should be able to take out ANY THING from a Low Earth Orbit on down!
Cruise missiles ~ kaput!.
Drones - kaput!
Fighter aircraft - kaput!
Bombers - kaput!
Tanks - kaput!
Bicycles - kaput!
And this stuff will only get better.
In large quantities; relatively inexpensive; launched from our ships anywhere on Earth; .....
40 posted on
08/03/2012 7:32:30 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: moonshot925
Navy?
The Airforce has had this for YEARS!
Well since season 4-5....
45 posted on
08/03/2012 7:38:45 AM PDT by
GraceG
To: moonshot925
46 posted on
08/03/2012 7:44:01 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: moonshot925
About a year ago, I was the guest of an official of a major university. Near his desk was a nicely mounted piece of one inch metal plate, about 10 inches square with a 5 inch hole blasted out of the middle. He said this was one plate out of a stack of a dozen or so that had been hit with an slug shot from one of their experimental electromagnetic cannons. He declined to give more details.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson