Posted on 08/02/2012 4:00:23 PM PDT by madprof98
You'd think this would draw a lot of interest from the biologists.
The saddest thing is, it’s a blight on Black families.
This isn’t good for them. The welfare moms aren’t proud of themselves. How could they be?
When I was growing up, about 16, my mother had a friend named Peggy. She had led a bit of a tough life. Probably wasn’t as tough as some, but was tougher than others.
Her first husband wasn’t a decent guy. The marriage split, and she had to take care of several boys. One thing she was always proud of, was that she never took a dime of welfare.
Today too many women in tight squeezes think nothing of taking welfare. How can I get on it, and how long can I stay on it?
Can I get it while I attend a four year college? Can I get other freebies too? What all CAN I get?
Is there any payback? Well, they may or may not become productive after they graduate, but the taxpayer has to foot their bills almost as long as they want them to.
That kind of thinking has got to stop. We’re spending somewhere in the neighborhood of $700 billion dollars a year on welfare. That can’t continue. It should never have been allowed to get anywhere near this point.
I’d send them a couple of Chick-Fil-A gift cards, with a note saying, “Sorry, can’t make it, but here, have dinner on me at you nearest Chick-Fil-A.”
But the dinner invitation from Marci Alt and wife Marlysa,...
Ah yes, the Commiemedia, always trying to set up an equivalence between "couple" and "wife" in the mind of readers.
“But the dinner invitation from Marci Alt and wife Marlysa,”
OK, so how do they decide which one is the “wife”.
Normally, I dislike using that term here, it is assigned by gender. How do Queers decide?
“I haven’t got a dick and the dick I don’t have is longer than the dick you don’t have, so I am the Husband and you are the Wife. However, if the dick you don’t have was bigger than the dick I don’t have, it would be reversed.”
Right, the best response is to ignore them. He doesn’t owe them the favor of playing a prop in their little attention seeking drama.
Well since they have invited him so that they ‘can share a respectful dialogue about our faith’, I think that he as a Christian should go. And what is the perspective that Mr Cathy can offer? How about “I hate to tell you this but you are lost and on the road to hell without a saviour”.
Mark 6:
10 And he said unto them, In what place soever ye enter into an house, there abide till ye depart from that place.
11 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
12 And they went out, and preached that men should repent.
“But the dinner invitation from Marci Alt and wife Marlysa,”
OK, so how do they decide which one is the “wife”.
Normally, I dislike using that term here, it is assigned by gender. How do Queers decide?
“I haven’t got a dick and the dick I don’t have is longer than the dick you don’t have, so I am the Husband and you are the Wife. However, if the dick you don’t have was bigger than the dick I don’t have, it would be reversed.”
Why use such a vulgar term? Simply saying that the women are lesbians would have sufficed.
Snarky, pompous.
A guy expresses his discontent with the hijacking of marriage, and the Leftwing cabal goes apeshit.
Hopefully he says, thank you for the invite. But I will decline your offer.
Nothing Mr. Cathy has said or done prevents these women from leading their perverted lives.
A "gay" group recently invited Kirk Cameron to meet with them under the same fake beneficent gesture. The SBC president foolishly met with the most radical of homosexual activist groups during last year's SBC convention.
The goal is obtaining a place at the table. Even if the "guest" never agrees with them, the sodomites win a victory by sitting down as supposed "equals." This is why declining these false invitations enrages them so much.
Because these phonies do not want it advertised what it is they do.Tell it like it is. Don’t let them hide their perversion under a name we accept. That’s the problem now we accept their proclivities.They call themselves LGBT instead of queers, perverts, and faggots.
Stop letting them hide under false colors and words we accept. We accept their terms and then we accept their actions. That’s why.
Right. Think about all the critical stories ABC hasn’t the time to cover. This is just propaganda.
That’s a pretty sad situation for your daughter’s class.
Then again, even “good” suburban children grow up watching trashy shows like Glee. Shacking up is honored and celebrated on television.
There are a lot of problems with our schools, but the reality is they can’t fix the basic problem of society which is breakdown of the traditional family unit.
Your mention of “Glee” is particularly relevant.
It’s chock full of gay propaganda, teen promiscuity, and slurs on conservatism.
Nope ... does not compute in my brain - and never will.
Otherwise, very precious little girls. What a shame.
There is no reason to go. They lesbians are trying to prove their home is normal. As the Lord has already spoke to him, there is nothing normal in that house. The Lord has already settled the matter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.