But apparently, they are all in support of the mormon cult leader Bishop from KOLOB, who was like 55 years old when all of a sudden he decided that baby killing was wrong, especially if he was going to get drooling imbeciles to vote for him for POTUS on a GOP ticket.
I wouldn't piss on this degenerate scumbag if he was on fire.
Let's hope this silver spoon idiots ride to KOLOB is a smooth one, and he achieves GOD status with minimum cost to the American taxpayer.
Well, the point is, he’s a steenking liar. Has no core conservative values whatsoever. Will say or do whatever he feels he has to say or do to get himself elected. But his core instinct is that of a big government statist. Proven by appointing liberal judges, knuckling under to the activist judiciary, supporting Roe v Wade as “settled” law, supporting gay rights, gays in the military, supporting the bailouts and the stimulus, supporting cap and trade, global warming, and ROMNEYCARE!!
He still brags about RomneyCare today, still worries about global warming, still refuses to fight or rein in liberal judges, still supports gays in the military, and has promised to trim here and there and to rearrange the deck chairs on the US Titanic rather than making the deep cuts in government that must be made to right the sinking ship.
And he’s still a steenking LIAR!! Once a liar, always a LIAR!! And he just told you that he IS a steenking LIAR!!
21 posted on Friday, December 30, 2011 5:00:15 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
First of all, if you disagree with supporting Romney as a prudent electoral strategy, you should put it in prudential terms, as our friend DoughtyOne does. (Tip o' the hat to you, Doughty.) Evidence sways thoughtful opinion. Reckless insult does not.
Second, these six eminent anti-Obama Catholics are not "useless morons." That you would say so is rash judgment and slander. Rash judgment and slander are still sins.
Third, your language is not only offensive to the people you have maligned, it also has the distinct disadvantage of being stupid. It will not gain you even the little benefit you perhaps hope for, which is swaying the opinions of thoughtful FReepers. You forfeit the gains you might otherwise have made through competent debate.
Fourth, you don't know these six ambassadors views on the denial of Holy Communion to abortion supporters (a denial which I, by the way, think is mandatory under Canon 915.) Many good people who were against abortion (e.g. Mother Teresa) never voiced a public opinion on this canonical question. As for the opinions of Glendon, Flynn and the rest, you do not know. To presume you do know, without evidence, is malicious credulity.
Take care. Cool down and try again. I will listen.