First of all, if you disagree with supporting Romney as a prudent electoral strategy, you should put it in prudential terms, as our friend DoughtyOne does. (Tip o' the hat to you, Doughty.) Evidence sways thoughtful opinion. Reckless insult does not.
Second, these six eminent anti-Obama Catholics are not "useless morons." That you would say so is rash judgment and slander. Rash judgment and slander are still sins.
Third, your language is not only offensive to the people you have maligned, it also has the distinct disadvantage of being stupid. It will not gain you even the little benefit you perhaps hope for, which is swaying the opinions of thoughtful FReepers. You forfeit the gains you might otherwise have made through competent debate.
Fourth, you don't know these six ambassadors views on the denial of Holy Communion to abortion supporters (a denial which I, by the way, think is mandatory under Canon 915.) Many good people who were against abortion (e.g. Mother Teresa) never voiced a public opinion on this canonical question. As for the opinions of Glendon, Flynn and the rest, you do not know. To presume you do know, without evidence, is malicious credulity.
Take care. Cool down and try again. I will listen.
If you are looking to the con man from KOLOB to save us from the con man from KENYA, all I can say is HAR!