To: SeekAndFind
He also said that manpads might be subject to fed reg, and that heavy weapons, artillery are under fed purview. Anyone that looks at his statements and gets their knikers in a twist is a dullard.
8 posted on
07/29/2012 5:11:27 PM PDT by
waynesa98
To: waynesa98
He also said that manpads might be subject to fed reg, and that heavy weapons, artillery are under fed purview. Anyone that looks at his statements and gets their knikers in a twist is a dullard. In a twist? But I so wanted that 120mm smooth bore!
To: waynesa98
It’s looking very much, on quite a few issues, that the left is doing quite a bit of “concern trolling” to suppress potential voters for the right, since they’re not going to get them this time.
32 posted on
07/29/2012 5:37:32 PM PDT by
mrsmel
(One Who Can See)
To: waynesa98
Thank you!--and I agree. I listened to him, and he did not rush to say guns SHOULD be controlled; he said the issue could always be brought up and discussed, and that even the Founders had some controls--i.e. muskets, hand guns--yes!--cannons, no!
I will take 3 more Scalias and 3 more Thomases, and keep Alito.
vaudine
59 posted on
07/29/2012 7:19:59 PM PDT by
vaudine
To: waynesa98
In the main I concur 100%, but I believe that Scalia may have been communicating a subtle warning to gun rights advocates about Roberts. With Roberts suddenly showing up shaky in the “strict constructionist” vein, any gun rights case that goes before the court is now a gamble.
63 posted on
07/29/2012 7:44:13 PM PDT by
Sudetenland
(Member of the BBB Club - Bye-Bye-Barry!!! President Barack "Down Low" Obama)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson