Skip to comments.
Dem lawmakers to announce bill limiting online ammo sales
The Hill ^
| July 29, 2012
| Meghashyam Mali
Posted on 07/29/2012 3:38:40 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: editor-surveyor
Absolutely! Nothing online is annonymous.
41
posted on
07/29/2012 4:25:26 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Intellect is not wisdom" -- Thomas Sowell)
To: umgud
>> “None of the past massacres involved thousands of rounds” <<
.
True, all they required is an UNARMED PUBLIC!
42
posted on
07/29/2012 4:26:32 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
To: jazusamo
Loughner, the gunman charged in the shooting of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (R-Ariz.) and Holmes, who is the lone suspect in the Aurora theater shootings are both believed to have used high-capacity magazines. I wonder if there is any way for the author to find out for sure and then get back with us.
43
posted on
07/29/2012 4:26:32 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(The NRA did not create James "The Joker" Holmes. Harvey Weinstein's Hollywood did.)
To: editor-surveyor
Was the Shooter “carrying” six thousand rounds of Ammunition when he committed the crime?
Now the ammunition is the problem? I thought 12 people died, not 6,000.
Only Communists, Dictators, Fascists and Nazis kill that many people at one time. Which is precisely why the Second Amendment exists.
To: Kickass Conservative
He could have done the job with a machete!
Nobody in that theater was armed; who would have stopped him?
45
posted on
07/29/2012 4:31:35 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
To: jazusamo
Were the Founding Fathers Sportsmen? Were the members of the Continental Army Sportsmen? Does the word Sportsmen appear in the text of the Second Amendment?
Maybe it was listed right after the word “hunters”, another word I must of missed.
To: jazusamo
You have to hope for Mitten's sake the Democrats are stupid enough to make an issue of something like this near an election. There is very broad support for the 2nd Amendment even amongst those who do not own a gun and those who do will vote on this issue alone.
To: jazusamo
Who cares of he had 600,000 rounds?
Was he carrying it around in his pocket?
48
posted on
07/29/2012 4:37:26 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Kickass Conservative
I doubt that wacko could lift 6k rounds, let alone pack it in and around. I just came in with 1500 rnds, my range bag and some toys and now I need multiple fine beers to recover.
49
posted on
07/29/2012 4:39:46 PM PDT
by
NativeSon
( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
To: editor-surveyor
Five bucks for gas, .20 cents for deposit bottles, some old rags and a bic lighter would have killed ten times as many.
I guess it was a good thing they weren't screening Inglorious Bastards.
To: jazusamo
Criminals will have NO PROBLEM getting ammo - because organized crime will provide it - - giving organized crime one more income stream.
Which makes criminals and crime families more powerful...
If you don’t hate liberals, you’re not paying attention.
51
posted on
07/29/2012 4:40:39 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Political correctness is simply George Orwell's Newspeak by a non-threatening name. FR- Bernard Marx)
To: jazusamo
These idiots think nothing of 25 ga of gasoline, but bullets scare them.
52
posted on
07/29/2012 4:40:57 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: jazusamo
The amount of ammo this guy actually used could have been bought at any Walmart any day of the week.
To: jazusamo
“make it harder for criminals to anonymously stockpile ammunition through the Internet. “
What’s anonymous about it? It has to be paid for by someone, and delivered to someone. That’s hardly anonymous.
54
posted on
07/29/2012 4:46:15 PM PDT
by
Fireone
(Traitors must be purged from Washington D.C.- Impeach, convict, and sentence!)
To: jazusamo
Of course this bill will fail, the only question is the political one.
Should Boehner put it up for a vote or not- get the Congress on the record?
Would putting it to a vote just give Democrats in the House a chance to get some 2nd Amendment bonafides by castinga “nay” vote and thus help them in the upcoming election?
To: jazusamo
The fact this gets reported is BS. These people don’t have the authority to even discuss this.
56
posted on
07/29/2012 4:49:34 PM PDT
by
elkfersupper
( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: jazusamo
they never miss an opportunity to ratchet up regulations tighter and tighter like a noose around our necks
To: jazusamo
Scalia said that gun control is possible.
We will see what Mitt says.
58
posted on
07/29/2012 4:53:03 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: 1malumprohibitum
Facts? Don’t confuse the lib-dem idiots with facts. Facts are stubborn things.
59
posted on
07/29/2012 5:04:41 PM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
(All libs and most dems think that life is just a sponge bath, with a happy ending.)
To: jazusamo
Stick a rider on it ending taxpayer paid security for government officials.
60
posted on
07/29/2012 5:05:39 PM PDT
by
Iron Munro
("Jiggle the Handle for Barry!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson