Skip to comments.
Dick Cheney: Picking Sarah Palin for VP Was 'A Mistake'
Yahoo/ABC News ^
 | Jonathan Karl
Posted on 07/29/2012 7:38:46 AM PDT by dirtboy
Dick Cheney has some advice for Mitt Romney on choosing a running mate: Don't pick another Sarah Palin. 
In his first interview since receiving a heart transplant in March, Cheney told ABC News, that John McCain's decision to pick Palin as his running mate in 2008 was "a mistake" - one that it is important from Romney not to repeat. 
It's subject on which Cheney has some unique experience. He helped Presidents Gerald Ford and George W. Bush lead their vice presidential searches and, of course, served as vice president for eight years. He's also privately offered some advice to both Romney and Beth Myers, who is leading Romney's search for a runningmate, on the process. 
Cheney would not comment on what he told Romney and Myers, but he was harsh in his assessment of McCain's decision to pick Palin. 
"That one," Cheney said, "I don't think was well handled." 
"The test to get on that small list has to be, 'Is this person capable of being president of the United States?'" 
Cheney believes Sarah Palin failed that test. 
"I like Governor Palin. I've met her. I know her. She - attractive candidate. But based on her background, she'd only been governor for, what, two years. I don't think she passed that test
of being ready to take over. And I think that was a mistake."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; abcdisneynews; cheney; cheney4dewhurst; cheneyvspalin; glbtabcdisney; gope; homosexualagenda; juanwasthemistake; palin; palinaccomplishments; palinbashing; palinrecord; pds; pravdamedia; rinos4dewhurst; sourgrapes; stayoutdabushes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 421-440 next  last
To: mkjessup
    Why does Cheney fail to name specific presidential duties that are beyond Palin’s abilities?
Because there are no specific functions of the Oval Office that Palin couldn’t perform. This is exemplified by her documented accomplishments as Governor.
 
181
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:35:11 AM PDT
by 
reasonisfaith
(Why do you seek the living among the dead? (Luke 24:5))
 
To: dirtboy
    The VP pick is the most overrated choice in all of politics. Unless the pick can bring in a huge amount of votes eg Kennedy picking Johnson for the southern Democrat vote,it don’t mean squat.
Quickly, who was Carters’ VP?
 
182
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:36:13 AM PDT
by 
Cyman
 
To: Mountain Mary
    “We the People are the only ones who can stop this by defunding the GOP and refusing to support their reachers across the aisle..”
It’s not enough to just defund the GOP. If the GOP win in November, that will afford conservatives some (little) time to look elsewhere for leadership. You have but to look at California to see the trajectory the GOP establishment is on.
 
To: 1rudeboy
    Your comprehension skills need some repair . . . . 
 #142: "It is sad that you consider the topic . . . ." [emphasis added]
 
 Thank you for establishing that indeed, your comprehension is lacking. My statement that it is "sad" that you consider the topic of child abuse to be rhetorical fodder for your own weak attempts to debate a topic, does not mean that my observation reflects my own personal sadness. It would seem that you have a tendency to make everything personal, the observation was to point out the hollowness of your own soul, a soul which would stoop that low in invoking child abuse to score some kind of points. You little rude one, are the sad one, and you continue to establish that with every post you make.
 
Do you find yourself feeling sad often? What else makes you sad? There are people on this thread who truly want to help you
 
 Your own projection confirms everything I've said.
 
 Get professional help.
184
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:36:58 AM PDT
by 
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
 
To: Humbug
    “Regardless of whether it was a mistake or not, i wish Palin hadnt been picked by McCain. Can you imagine how strong she would have been this go around without the media hounding her and trying to sabotage her every day for the past 4 years?”
Sarah Palin was launched onto the public American stage as a result of being chosen as McCain’s running mate. So like a bad marriage that produces great kids(mine), it was the only way for her to become the influential woman that she is today.
Cheney and everyone else who opines about what shoulda or coulda been is wasting their own and everyone else’s time.
It is what is it. Now let’s get out of the way and allow Sarah to continue to do what she does best.,,ie help Conservatives get elected to office.
 
185
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:38:40 AM PDT
by 
Mountain Mary
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
 
To: reasonisfaith
    Why does Cheney fail to name specific presidential duties that are beyond Palins abilities? 
 
 You would be better served directing that inquiry to the former Vice President's website.
 
 Because there are no specific functions of the Oval Office that Palin couldnt perform. This is exemplified by her documented accomplishments as Governor.
 
 For those tuning in late, perhaps you could list those documented accomplishments for us? I've misplaced my copy, thanks for the help.
186
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:38:58 AM PDT
by 
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
 
To: 1rudeboy
    >>>Palin did not lose the election for McCain. McCain lost the election for McCain.>>>
Amen!
I waited week by week for McCain to make a statement about why he should be president. I gave up the night before the election.
 
187
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:39:29 AM PDT
by 
kitkat
 
To: 1rudeboy
188
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:39:50 AM PDT
by 
dirtboy
 
To: SkyDancer
189
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:40:45 AM PDT
by 
My Favorite Headache
(In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big. Vote Newt!)
 
To: dirtboy
    No the mistake was Bush picking the homo-marriage supporting, war profiteer Dick Cheney AS HIS RUNNING MATE.
Sarah Palin was the only reason McCain didn’t lose 40 states.
 
190
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:41:20 AM PDT
by 
NKP_Vet
 
To: dirtboy
191
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:41:41 AM PDT
by 
My Favorite Headache
(In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big. Vote Newt!)
 
To: dirtboy
    J.D. Hayworth? You mean the guy who ran for office in a Tea Party era knowing he had been in an informercial touting ways to get free government money? 
 
 Sounds like you were supporting McCain in that primary. Looks good on you.
 
 He should have stayed on the radio and allowed a good conservative without his baggage to run instead.
 
 I don't recall our esteemed Founder (who supported Hayworth) calling on that conservative candidate to drop out in favor of someone more qualified? Who did you have in mind instead of Hayworth?
 
 Take your time.
192
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:41:41 AM PDT
by 
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
 
To: mkjessup
    Does the internet make you sad?
 
To: dirtboy
    Not at all, however Cheney's position on homos (irregardless of his daughter being a lesbian) has nothing to do with the topic of this thread, is that not correct? 
 Pretty funny coming from a guy who has posted solely to bash Palin supporters instead of discussing Cheney's comments, pro or con.
 
 Au contraire, my posts were directed at those extreme Palin supporters whose Cheney-hating comments were so over the top that they screamed out for rebuke. The hate being directed at our former Vice President would be condemned by Sarah Palin herself, and those assailing Dick Cheney ought to know that. 
 
 Do you?
194
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:44:57 AM PDT
by 
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
 
To: dirtboy
    Palin was not ready to be President because she isn’t part of the elitist globalist club, of which Dick Cheney is a member.
 
195
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:45:58 AM PDT
by 
Third Person
( A man's got to know his limitations.)
 
To: mkjessup
    The onus is on Cheney to describe the specific duties that he’s claiming are beyond Palin’s abilities.
In trying to appeal to emotion, Cheney ignores facts and logic.
Again, the question is: what specific duties could Palin not do?
 
196
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:46:39 AM PDT
by 
reasonisfaith
(Why do you seek the living among the dead? (Luke 24:5))
 
To: dirtboy; 1rudeboy
    You two need to get a room.
 
197
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:48:01 AM PDT
by 
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
 
To: dirtboy
    After the way Bush/Cheney led the country for eight years I don’t think Cheney has too much credibility in judging who is fit to be president.
 
To: mkjessup
    Sounds like you were supporting McCain in that primary. Looks good on you.Uh, no, I was not. I would have preferred someone like Shadegg to get in. Hayworth was a compromised candidate from the beginning, as events proved out. And he ran without caring that he was compromised, and too many people were so eager to get rid of McCain that they failed to see the problems with Hayworth until it was too late.
 
199
posted on 
07/29/2012 9:48:48 AM PDT
by 
dirtboy
 
To: mkjessup
    How about angry? Does the internet make you angry?
  
#83: "I hit the abuse on your puerile graphic . . . ."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 421-440 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson