Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Wow,two guys who won't garner a single Electoral vote between them.That's *sure* to be "must see TV".

(Do I need to place a sarcasm tag here?)

6 posted on 07/27/2012 5:12:28 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Poor Barack.If He's Reelected,Think Of The Mess He'll Inherit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

Funny how some people bitch about Obama and Romney, then when someone decides to do something as a conservative, the dipsticks come out of the woodwork to slag them. Congrats for helping to convince more people to sit and never do anything. Getting stabbed in the back by one’s own is always a good motivator. /s


8 posted on 07/27/2012 5:22:55 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative; EternalVigilance
Wow,two guys who won't garner a single Electoral vote between them.That's *sure* to be "must see TV".

Congratulations Tom!

Don't let the RomneyBot JackAsses get you down, I don't expect any better behavior from them given the lying, left-wing Progressive Liberal they support.
36 posted on 07/27/2012 6:37:45 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative; EternalVigilance; P-Marlowe
Wow,two guys who won't garner a single Electoral vote between them.That's *sure* to be "must see TV".

Let's use your own logic, GSC. You live in Massachusetts. There isn't a snowball's chance that Romney will win in Massachusetts in a presidential election. Rasmussen lists Massachusetts as one of the bluest of blue states. He says that Obama has a 56-35 lead over Mitt, and that even though Romney was governor there, he is doing very poorly. Rasmussen, of course, uses likely voters, and a realistic party affiliation weighting. His numbers in Massachusetts are probably right on the money.

Therefore, you are throwing your vote away voting for Romney in Massachusetts. You know I'm right.

So, if you are suggesting that conservatives who vote for 3rd party candidates are throwing their vote away, then why are you pushing a candidate in Massachusetts who does not have a chance, who amounts to your throwing your vote away?

Your best bet, since Romney has zero chance in your state, is to vote your conservative principles for a real conservative. That way you would AT LEAST have some benefit come from your vote. You would send a message to the GOP-E that you want no more liberal candidates.

You sarcastically called yourself "Gay State Conservative". We both know that folks like Barney Frank AND Mitt Romney helped make the punchline of your joke make sense.

Don't throw away your Massachusetts vote. Vote for the most conservative candidate who makes your Massachusetts ballot. The BEST a Massachusetts conservative could hope for is to send a message.

The message of a vote for Romney would be: I think Romney and liberal Rinos are fine and dandy.

The message of a vote for a 3rd party would be: I insist on conservatives and will vote my conservative principles.

So, which will it be?

51 posted on 07/27/2012 9:07:43 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
Wow,two guys who won't garner a single Electoral vote between them.That's *sure* to be "must see TV".

This article reminds me of The Onion back when it was funny.

70 posted on 07/28/2012 10:27:33 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson