“Of course it’s easier if you hold an Olympic Games in the middle of nowhere.”
By “middle of nowhere”, I will assume you meant where there aren’t any Muslims living in huge numbers with designs on turning your town into Pakistan on the North Sea.
And also SLC took place only a few months after 9-11, you brit-t*at. So yes it was a bit harder to hold that Olympics than most.
p.s. You already had one muzzie attack a torch-bearer, so you need to try harder.
And London hosted an Olympics when the country was still ravaged by six years of war, the country was near-broke, and the British people still had rationing.
Whats your point?.
96% of the UK is NOT muslim.
As Flavor Flav might say, dont believe the hype.
96% of the UK is NOT muslim.
As Flavor Flav might say, dont believe the hype.
I think Cameron’s comments refer to the geographical ‘easiness’ of hosting an Olympics in more open country, as opposed to a huge city like London, which is geographically in a more packed area.
IMO his comments werent a dig at the 2002 games being in some sort of ‘backwater’.
Out here in the middle of nowhere!