Posted on 07/27/2012 6:56:35 AM PDT by Qbert
Yep, he was quite a character.
What's the muzzie pop % of Londonistan and why is it called that?
" 40% of England's Muslims live in London, where they make up 8.5% of the population."
Exactly.
Britain couldnt have won the war without America and Canada (who were actually our biggest supplier of arms and material). And the Commonwealth and Empire. Without the US-Canadian armies, we couldnt have solely taken on and defeated the Nazis and Italians, Vichy French and the Japs. Also of course the huge USSR contribution which kept 75% of all Germans away from the West....
America couldnt have won the war without the British. Without our (then still) huge resources, manpower and material and those of Canada, India, NZ, SA, Australia.
American troops would never have landed in Europe or N Africa without the Royal Navy. And the RAF.
In fact without the predominately British-Canadian victory in the Battle of the Atlantic, US troops would never have crossed the sea....
And where would America have been without the British nuclear secrets OR the British codebreakers?. Or the many British technological breakthroughs (Colossus, Bailey Bridge, PLUTO, the Mulberry Harbours etc etc)?......
So the idea that America saved us is pure fiction. And insulting.
Madonna! Or Madge as the Brits call her. She's been working on her accent for years!
1—All cities are multicultural, they always have been. Its their nature.
2-So?. Since when was London the whole UK anymore than New York is the whole US?.
And in ww1, half of all US troops carried across the Atlantic were carried by the Royal Navy. And ALL US troops taken from England to France were carried by the RN.
And the AEF in 1917-18 relied entirely on British and French tanks, airplanes and artillery pieces.
And all US combat training in France was given by British and French officers and trainers.
Seriously, does anybody know what Romney actually said? The only thing about these tempest in a teapot which I caught on the radio was the interviewer talking about London's preparation problems and Romney answering that none of that was going to matter once the well-prepared athletes from all over the world took the stage today.
Really? Can anyone explain how a complimentary statement on the athletes got twisted into a critical statement on London's preparations or lack thereof?
Alright, alright, we get the picture, man. Don’t get your kilt all in a wad. ;)
I think a lot of resentment from Americans comes from how Europe mishandled the peace after WWI.
No event, with the possible exception of the marathon, has had so many protests, and counter-protests as the men's relays. In 1948, although the United States won the 4 x 400m relay easily, one of the change-over judges ruled that the USA exchange was outside of the passing zone. Consequently, by rule, the USA team was disqualified.
By the time the USA protested the medals had been handed out to GB, Italy and Hungary. However after carefully reviewing film of the controversial baton pass, the stewards decided that the baton had been exchanged legal. Furthermore, they instructed the British team to pass up their gold medals to the USA team.
Prior to our involvement in WWII, the Lend Lease Act kept you from being worn down by attrition. Without it and without our contributions, Normandy and the liberation of Europe would have never been possible....and you know it.
Don't be butt hurt over the truth.
I'd suggest that a larger city would have an easier time with logistics as the relative impact of a large influx of peeps on the existing infrastructure would be smaller.
London has a larger airport (and maybe a 2nd one), more lodging and more public transportation on an absolute basis.
The security issue could easily be the opposite for nearly the same reasons (excepting the MUCH larger number of militant islamists in London which makes it even more difficult to control/prevent "events" there, even if the security team weren't recently beefed up at the last minute).
I think business at Trolley Square is still down since that event.
I heard that it was going to be Roger Bannister. First person to break the 4-minute mile.
American troops didnt fight in large numbers until April/May 1918, and an American army didnt undertake a solo major offensive until SEPTEMBER 1918, at St Mihiel.
It was the British (along with French and Australian and Canadian troops) who took the brunt of the German counterattack in Easter 1918 (the ‘kaiserschlact’).
And it was the BRITISH who bore the brunt of what became known as the ‘Hundred Day Offensive’ in the summer of 1918, that drove the Germans back to the German border.
Frankly the Canadian and AUSTRALIAN units in 1918 did as much, if not more, to drive the Germans back.
And in ww1, half of all US troops carried across the Atlantic were carried by the Royal Navy. And ALL US troops taken from England to France were carried by the RN.
And the AEF in 1917-18 relied entirely on British and French tanks, airplanes and artillery pieces.
And all US combat training in France was given by British and French officers and trainers.
The American contribution to WW1 and to 1918 and final victory, although helpful and brave, has been grossly exaggerated.
It was the British who won the Western Front in 1918. And I am not saying that because I am British. Its because its the truth.
Are Americans aware of just how many major sports events and tournaments Great Britain hosts and has hosted in recent years?. And how many it is due to host just this decade?.
Not one so far with any violence, terrorism or problem. From Glasgow to London, Cardiff to Edinburgh.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_sports_event_hosting_in_Britain_during_the_2010s
Are Americans aware of just how many major sports events and tournaments Great Britain hosts and has hosted in recent years?. And how many it is due to host just this decade?.
Not one so far with any violence, terrorism or problem. From Glasgow to London, Cardiff to Edinburgh.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_sports_event_hosting_in_Britain_during_the_2010s
Take it easy MacGregor, we’re all friends here...
Pity they waited until 1918, since the U.S. help was superfluous and all. 1,000,000 fresh American troops meant the end for Germany and they knew it - they could not fight for another two, three or four years because their support at home was collapsing.
I'm sure we appreciated the training and equipment - it was, after all, the least you could do, since it really wasn't our party in the first place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.