Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett

That set of Yaogan satellites would have a very short life expectancy if things heated up over there.

A missile that takes out a US carrier would be better named “The Nuclear War Initiator”.

Any administration that did not counter-strike VERY powerfully after a carrier sinking would doom their party to at least 2 generations out of power.


5 posted on 07/24/2012 9:38:44 PM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bobalu

I’m sure that Obama would send the most heartfelt note and condolences to the families of crew, he might even shed a tear and mention God.

To the Chinese he’d be quite scolding.


20 posted on 07/24/2012 10:27:03 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bobalu
"Any administration that did not counter-strike VERY powerfully after a carrier sinking would doom their party to at least 2 generations out of power."

I wouldn't want to take bets on an Obama Administration response. It would likely be whatever was the worst option for the US.

46 posted on 07/25/2012 3:54:55 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bobalu
Any administration that did not counter-strike VERY powerfully after a carrier sinking would doom their party to at least 2 generations out of power

You are dreaming.

A carrier at sea is the ultimate military target. No civilians for thousands of miles.

No President could or would kill civilians over a purely military strike.

72 posted on 07/25/2012 11:21:13 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown are by desperate appliance relieved or not at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson