Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: buffaloguy

The M-16, military half-brother to the civilian AR-15, was not designed to kill. It’s design is to injure and maim. The theory is that an injured enemy will take out the effectiveness of two others to care for him..................


23 posted on 07/23/2012 10:19:44 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

“The M-16, military half-brother to the civilian AR-15, was not designed to kill. It’s design is to injure and maim. The theory is that an injured enemy will take out the effectiveness of two others to care for him..................”

I would rather face a guy with a an AR-15 than a guy with a Remington 700 chambered in .308. Or any other caliber for that matter.

The number I have heard is that a wounded soldier requires 7 people, a dead soldier none.


32 posted on 07/23/2012 10:32:32 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Well, that’s just bullshit.
The M-16, and every other rifle in military service, was designed to KILL. Period.

The 5.56mm round is a smaller, faster round than the .308/7.62mm “main battle rifle” cartridge it replaced, but there was NEVER any intention to just “wound” the enemy.

It may not do the job as well as other rounds, but that’s a defect, not a feature.


53 posted on 07/23/2012 11:05:49 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson