Posted on 07/20/2012 10:30:53 AM PDT by bayouranger
Huma Abedin, Secretary Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, could be the nicest woman with the greatest character, but that is not the issue nor should it be a reason to prevent ny inquiry into her family background and connection to the Muslim Brotherhood. Instead of attacking Representative Bachmann for raising important questions regarding Muslim Brotherhood penetration of the US government, the response from the media and Senator McCain should have been a statement to the effect that Abedin has already been vetted and has a sound security clearance. But instead, the response was: “How dare you, Michele Bachmann!”
Now let us examine Huma’s mother’s history and activities. Dr. Saleha Mahmood Abedin has been identified in Saudi Arabia as one of the founding members of the Muslim Sisterhood, a Muslim Brotherhood women’s group. This is the same group that half of Egypt was too scared to vote for and that was criminalized for many decades in Egypt for its subversiveness and terror activities. Dr. Abedin is no ordinary Muslim woman, but an activist who supports Sharia law. She is also a long-time chairperson of the “International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child” (IICWC). Now let us examine what that group is doing in Egypt today and why many Egyptians are afraid of its activities and are strongly denouncing it.
The last elections in Egypt have proved that half of Egypt is afraid of the Muslim Brotherhood and does not want to live under Sharia, but that is not the same concern of Abedin’s organization (IICWC), which is advocating Sharia law. The IICW contributed greatly to fear of its agenda after a recent publication in Arabic on its website. The following topics were discussed, among others, suggesting the annulment of Egyptian moderate laws, which would be replaced by Sharia laws. Below are some of the positions that appeared in the IICWC publication:
* The IICWC position that the current laws criminalizing female genital mutilation be revoked. * The IICWC’s position demanding that the laws forbidding child marriage below the age of eighteen be revoked. No new minimum marriage age was given; the group stated that the marriage standard depends on the financial and mental ability and not dependent on a specific age. * The IICWC’s positions, as reported, demanding that the laws forbidding marital rape be revoked and that polygamy is a right for men. * The IICWC’s position that a health check-up before marriage be revoked since it is against religion and should not be part of the marriage contract. * The IICWC’s position that criminal responsibility triggering at age 18 be reduced to age 15. * The IICWC’s position revokes the right of a woman to register her newborn by herself for a birth certificate because Sharia states that a child’s lineage is given strictly to the father and his paternal line. The child belongs to the father even if it was the product of adultery. * The IICWC’s position revokes the criminalization of physical and mental abuse of parents against children, so long as the punishment does not cause a permanent deformity or the beating is too extreme.
Above are the values that Huma Abedin’s mother believes in and that her organization is trying to impose on the Egyptian public after the revolution. Huma did not keep a distance from her mother’s activities when she introduced Secretary Clinton to her activist mother. During Clinton’s visit to Saudi Arabia, the US Secretary of State visited and spoke at the Islamic college of Dar El-Hekma together with Huma, where Dr. Saleha Abedin was a vice-dean and one of its founders.
All of the above scare the reformists in Egypt and does not look good for our Secretary of State. As a consequence of such appearances, to say the least, several Egyptian reformists have recently accused Secretary Clinton of taking the side of the Muslim Brotherhood in the recent elections. Even the appalling mob protest against Clinton in Alexandria Egypt was done mainly by those who accused her of being on the side of the Muslim Brotherhood.
When it comes to politics, appearances do count and Huma and Clinton’s defenders need to understand that. Rep. Bachmann and her colleagues should be applauded for pushing the alarm button, not just regarding Abedin, but regarding many others in our government, to alert us all to a possible security threat from the Muslim Brotherhood and the “civilization jihad” they aspire for in America.
SLAVERY, TERRORISM and ISLAM
The following is a description (slightly modified) from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat. Link
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness.
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs [Europe, Australia, USA and Japan]. Six percent of US prison inmates are Muslim. Like any other minority, they won’t integrate, but work to build their own separate community.
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. South Africa’s Muslim population is 2%, but they control 35% of the businesses, a large percentage of the banks and have five Cabinet seats while Christians (77% of the population) have none.
They will push for the introduction of halaal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves (along with threats for failure to comply).
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia; Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world, but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. (Ei: car-burnings in France last October.) Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats.
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning (India, Mindanao, Philippines).
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare [Indonesia]. From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya (infidel tax). (Sudan, Kosovo, Lebanon and Egypt).
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide [Western Papua (New Guinea), Iran, Biafra, Turkey and North Nigeria].
100% will usher in the peace of “Dar-es-Salaam
I see that even the RINOs are lining up to kick Michele Bachmann for suggesting that the Beast’s “partner” may be a security threat, just because her family is a bunch of radical muzzie terrorists. Well, I guess when they kill us all, we’ll have the satisfaction of knowing we were politically correct. Of course the biggest security risk is the illegal alien that no one really knows anything about and who sits is the oval office.
it ramadan.
Islamist activists have 2 faces .
The violent fanatical face and a political more diplomatic face....Only consistant and conscious dhimmies and brainwashed morons are “duped” by those 2 faces
M.Bachman should nail it again and again with articulate arguments refusing to get down before the liberal-dhimmy front
In early 2008 a really smart guy who I totally respect told me:
“there’s no way the American people are going to elect a guy named Hussein”
two years later I’m getting two checks a month (SS and pension) signed by this guy
un-friggin-believable
“... her family is a bunch of radical muzzie terrorists.”
There isn’t an American Conservative with a background half as objectionable as THAT who’d still hold political office in this country!
I am so glad John Boehner has joined John McCain in saying how absurd this is and how bad it makes Michelle Bachmann look. She needs to apologize but the time has come and gone when it would have any credibility.
How does it make Michelle Bachmann look bad?
I don’t believe what she is saying at all, and she should stuff it.
Well, you can always cry if it makes you feel better.
But she is a friend of McCain and that is all that matters. This is the schmoozing disease of politics today.
But she is a friend of McCain and that is all that matters. This is the schmoozing disease of politics today.
They were in the White House during Clinton’s administration and they were in the George W. White House on the very day of 9/11. Have you ever read the Frank Gaffney account of what happened on 9/11? On that very day, Grover Norquist had his contingency of CAIR goons were all set to visit with President George W. Bush when the terrorists hit. At that time Frank Gaffney worked with Norquist and shared a conference room. Since the president couldn’t speak with the CAIR goons due to the terrorist attack, the CAIR goons went back to Norquists office to use the conference room. This is when Gaffney saw this group of muslims coming down the hall with Grover Norquist.
Norquist is the one who put the “religion of peace” words in Bush’s mouth. Too bad that we have presidents and leaders today who must have slept through history class.
How do I get an invite to the White House?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
