Posted on 07/20/2012 9:39:34 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
James Holmes, the suspect arrested in connection with the mass shootings at a screening of the new Batman movie early this morning in Aurora, CO, could be a registered Democrat, according to documents obtained by Breitbart News. Earlier, ABC News' Brian Ross and George Stephanopoulos speculated on Good Morning America that Holmes was a Tea Party member, based solely on a name appearing on a Tea Party website.
The James Holmes for whom Breitbart News has obtained documentation is 25 years old (the suspect has been reported as 24 years old). He has links to addresses in both Colorado and San Diego, where his mother has been reported to be from, according to news reports. He was issued a traffic citation in 2011--his sole run-in with the law. The same is true for the suspect arrested in connection with the shootings, according to reports. Update: Fox News reports that the suspect has a California-issued social security number, as does the man in the documents obtained by Breitbart News--a significant correlation, assuming the sources are independent.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Even though it sucks, it IS private property. They have the right to decide who and what comes onto their property.
And you do have a choice to go into their property - or not to. For myself, I do NOT patronize any establishment that refuses to recognize my right to defend my life, my family, and those around me.
BUT...and here’s the rub:
IF they’re going to decide that people are not allowed to defend themselves, then THEY are personally, financially, and legally responsible and obligated for the safety of the people on their property, and should be held criminally and civilly liable.
Armed guards could maybe have stemmed the slaughter.
But we’ll never know now, will we...
“...But that CCW license would be most important to find out...”
Likewise, the innocent folks on the 9-11-2001 airliners that were slaughtered because they were forcibly disarmed by law and prevented from boarding an airliner with their lawful and legal CCW.
I was surprised that activists on our side didn’t start looking through available records to see who was licensed to carry and was killed because they couldn’t. Demanding, actually, that the individual states’ AGs (or whoever is responsible) release the records of the deceased under FOIA.
And yeah, I know - you’ll hear some idiots screaming about “What if they shot on the plane and hit an innocent person...”
My answer is always the same...The WHOLE PLANE, full of innocent people, plus innocent people on the ground and in the Towers, DIED because no one could shoot back at the muzzie goat humpers.
To my mind, whenever a politician proposes and the legislature passes a no-guns ordinance, they’re just as responsible for the murder of innocent folks as the person who perpetrates it.
And THEY should be held as accountable as the guy who pulled the trigger.
How many people in NYC, NJ, Chicago, Massachusetts, etc., would still be alive had they been able to lawfully carry and defend themselves at the time they were attacked and murdered?
People like Bloomberg and his ilk - I see them exactly as the same as the scumbags killing innocent folks in the streets.
One uses a gun; the other uses the law. The end result is the same - some family loses a Father, a Mother, a Son, A daughter, a Grandmom, a Grandpop...
And it just goes on and on and on, and NOBODY on our side sues these maggots into oblivion, or shows up with a Thousand Man March outside their offices with signs and bullhorns.
Seriously...what other group would put up with the things we put up with - the intentional suppression of our rights - mind you, rights that are SPECIFICALLY enumerated in the US Constitution?
We’re legion; there are millions of us, and we sit passively by while these media and political maggots use an atrocity to advance their agenda.
I say every time a person is murdered in a gun-control state/city/county, we fund and erect billboards with the names and faces of the political maggots that passed the laws preventing people from carrying.
“This person caused the death of John Doe by making it Illegal to carry a firearm for self-defense.” And the current number of deaths in that area due to murder.
We get what we’re willing to settle for. And we’re getting it now.
And what if mental illness causes one to turn Left? Many of us believe radical Islamics are mentally ill.
Aren’t most of the beliefs of both groups Bat shit crazy?
Thanks - I just sat down at my comp for another few mintues and found this on another site, I have no idea of his sources:
Occupy Black Bloc Member James Holmes Shoots Up Aurora Co Movie Theater Killing 12 And Wounding 50.
http://www.pibillwarner.com/2012/07/occupy-black-bloc-member-james-holmes.html
“...n a darkened theater, do you seriously think it’s a good idea to pull a gun and start shooting in a panic of hundreds of people?...”
Why, because someone might get killed? Like 15 people who got shot by a lunatic that NO ONE had the means to stop?
One person with the means, determination, and the will could have limited the slaughter.
Same with Virgina Tech, 9-11-2001, etc.
People die every day. But to be slaughtered because you’re “not allowed” to fight back is just stupid.
Carry everywhere, all ways. Your life might depend on it.
Refuse to patronize establishments and businesses that refuse to see you as a human being with a RIGHT to stay alive.
You are the First Responder, always and everywhere. No one is responsible for saving your life except you and you alone.
At the end of the day when it comes to wolves, you’re either sheep, or sheepdog.
Was this incident a terrorist act intended to prevent people from seeing this movie?
Was the villain too close to Occupy Wall Street rhetoric to be allowed to go before the public?
Was this movie too damaging to the Obama campaign’s main contention?
Is this guy a Moslem?
When did he register as a Democrat?
Where is his Facebook page?
Was there only one shooter?
These are some of the questions which should be asked.
Do they routinely report whether someone is a member of the democrat or republican party when there is a violent crime?
Why is being affilated with the TEA Party newsworthy?
I understand if someone is a member of an Islamic Militant movement - then that might be indicitive of a greater danger... and would be newsworthy.
But, the tea party?
ABC accomplished what it wanted to.
No one is questioning that a tea party affiliation would be germane to the case - if indeed this person had been a member of the tea party.
But, thats OK because ABC is very sorry for this mistake.
The die has been cast.
When some nut does do something violent - and he does have a tea party affiliation - then...
See! Tea pary people are racist, murderer, rapist, etc..
Why don't you tell me how inaccurate I am first.
You can start with the “Peace Movement” of the 1960’s.
Tell me how peaceful the left was and weren't,t encouraging violence.
Tell me how peaceful the Weather Underground was.
Tell me how peaceful all the left wing unions are.
Tell me how peaceful OWS is.
Was this incident a terrorist act intended to prevent people from seeing this movie?
Was the villain too close to Occupy Wall Street rhetoric to be allowed to go before the public?
Was this movie too damaging to the Obama campaign’s main contention?
Is this guy a Moslem?
When did he register as a Democrat?
Where is his Facebook page?
Was there only one shooter?
These are some of the questions which should be asked.
Think of it; He will be eligible to vote for Obama in November.
Come on folks... This isn't rocket surgery.
From what they’re saying on Fox now he was really at the top of the cream in a very difficult academic field, one not known for attracting nut cases. Also, as somebody who did quite well in undergraduate and law school, I’ll say getting there took a lot of very serious effort from him and a terrific amount of highly dedicated ambition. Totally weird for a white man (no AA) on the threshold of what would have been a stellar career to go and utterly destroy his entire future that way when he had a future that almost almost anyone would envy.
The left had people like this actually believing if they got together to protest Wall street, someone else would be forced by the government (Oboma) to pay off their student loans for them.
This guy must owe quite a bit in student loans by now.
I think he got so wrapped up in OWS, and the concept he'd be loan free because of it, he became radicalized by OWS.
Guys like this are the easiest targets of all.
You could easily say this guy is a victim of the "Get out the youth vote" by the Oboma campaign. They started all this anarchy and violence in an attempt to demonize the capitalist enemy.
.
Yo, Dead...
Some people just don’t get it...and probably never will...
LFOD, brother.
I also wonder what he called himself on that second epicenter of sewage and psychosis, YouTube?!
Sounds like the police are being manipulated. He doesn’t run. Tells them his apartment is snagged. Another person opened the door for him to get in. .......the next shoe to drop.
Americans had better get armed more!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.