It annoys me that these guys attack Michele without bothering to refute her assertion.
When you are dealing in facts, it should be easy enough to refute her if she's wrong. From my memory, this was all brought out years ago, and yes, the girl's father is in bed with Muslim Brotherhood.
So, she has ties. Has she said or done anything to disavow the Brotherhood?
>Has she said or done anything to disavow the Brotherhood?<
Not as far as I know.
Did you know that Bill Clinton married Huma and Weiner, and that in addition to her mother, her brother is also a member of the Muslim Brotherhood?
Here’s an interesting article: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/06/the_muslim_brotherhood_and_weiner.html
That’s the problem isn’t it. Refute her concerns with facts. Show that our own politicians are beholden to Saudi Arabian money. Show that America’s foreign policy supports the only democracy in the ME (if you think Iraq is a democracy you’re not paying attention).
There’s been a fervent view that Israel needs to be brought to heel. Liberals are notoriously anti-Semitic. If Abedin is allied with the MB we should know. That she’s Hilary’s paramour isn’t any of our business, though.
There's no specific, credible evidence Huma's long dead (about 20 yrs) father had direct or even indirect ties to Muslim Brotherhood. There's just innuendo. There's even less evidence her mother or other family are connected.
The "source" appears to be a special-interest group.
I remember when Democrats were saying the evidence wasn't as important as the seriousness of the charge and that's what I see going on here. It's a sham and Bachmann's being played.
Your memory is wrong. Her father died in 1993 and therefore has ties to nobody. You should be embarrassed to peddle that kind of nonsense. How many radical Muslims do you honestly think go out and marry Jews?