Posted on 07/17/2012 3:30:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Ah... Franklin Delano Roosevelt conservatism.
Thanks, but no.
/johnny
Thank you very much, Marcella!! May God save our Republic!!
If only Perot had changed his name to “Other”, there would have been no Clinton and no Obama. LOL
This is not WWII. Obama and Romney may both think they’re dictators, but there’s no tators there. Petty tyrants should be spanked and run out of Dodge. Support your local sheriff.
So once again WHY would you even take the time to vote for Goode? What delusion are you operating under?
Cubed.
We missed a golden opportunity here. But, politics is never 'done.' Or fixed, whatever. It's just constant battle.
We do still have some good opportunities though. We still have a good chance in House and Senate races. If we take these, I believe (really do) that they will pass needed bills to undo much of Obamanation.
We really just need a president that will sign them.
IMHO, FWIW.
Well, if Jim’s tied up, I hear Sarah’s available.
To watch you wet your panties when your liberal with an R behind his name fails.
If Republicans want conservatives to vote for their guy... that guy needs to be conservative.
I'll vote for someone that has a pro-life, pro-gun, small government history.
/johnny
Have you been voting Republican in the past? Did you vote for Bush, or McCain?
If you have been voting conservative in the past then you are counted as one of our team who needs to vote for us to win. So here's your answer. Obama: 1,000,000 votes Romney: 999,999 votes
Your non vote has elected Obama.
Now, do you have any other math questions?
A Romney presidency could potentially be even more damaging than 0bama's re-election. Why?
Presuming that the GOP maintains control of the House, and considering the fact that they might also take the Senate, it is a distinct possibility that a Romney presidency could accomplish significantly more socialism than if 0bama were re-elected.
Believe me, I wish this wasn't a likely scenario, but unfortunately for all Americans, it is...
You may be fine with Obama, but most aren’t. I’ll take hemorrhoids over pancreatic cancer. At least there’s cream to soothe the pain.
It’s either four years of Romney or for more years of Obama. I’ve made my choice, just as you have.
Damn, Kent. You got pull.
Who knew that you singlehandedly controlled the fate of the Republic.
Rock on.
/johnny
'Sod off' is my typical reply.
/johnny
/johnny
I'm certainly not operating under the delusion that the election is going to be an honest count, nor that the electorate oppose what the Ruling Class have brainwashed the majority into envying and wanting the government to become.
Hopeless and clueless are those who put their faith in a corrupted system of men who have either abandoned God or are become so lukewarm as to have no saltiness left their principles and faith.
As the saying goes, the president proposes and congress disposes.
Legislation begins in congress, the president’s role here is to sign or veto.
The chance of Obama signing legislation repealing Obamanation is zero.
The chance of Romney signing is somewhat higher.
None that you have even the slightest chance of comprehending -- much less correctly solving! -- from the shockingly inadequate evidence provided. You are, to put it as charitably as possible, howlingly innumerate.
1.)You begin, literally, with a baldly unsupported (and unsupportable) assumption: that any given political party does, or even can, somehow peremptorily "own" a vote, prior to its being cast.
To label such an assertion "moronic," sadly, would only serve to ennoble it considerably. Support said assertion,to the best of your demonstrably meager abilities. I'll even be gracious, and offer bonus points if you're wearing big, orange floppy shoes while so attempting. (I entertain easily.)
2.)You either cheat (ineptly), or else are simply incapable of reading for simple, baseline comprehension. Your "answer" -- poor, palsied thing that it is -- arbitrarily changed the given parameters of the equation, by simply lowering Mittens' already established vote total, for no stated or supported reason.
The epic, towering imbecility in attempting something so profoundly bone-headed and self-humiliating -- in a written and archived forum, mind -- requires no further elucidation on my part.
Yours is, quite simply, the most spectacularly buck-toothed, knock-kneed and profoundly inbred demonstration of purest, unalloyed FAIL I have ever yet had the goggle-eyed and disbelieving experience of witnessing, online.
Congratulations, I suppose.
(Dearest God... please, oh please save me from the spastic fumblings of the thickly and obdurately innumerate -- !)
FINN: get a load of this thalidomide circus act, willya...? ;)
Who knew that you singlehandedly controlled the fate of the Republic.
You know, Johnny: I can actually remember a time, not all that long past, really -- i.e., my own grade school years, in the early '60s -- when kids in school were actually grounded in the most rudimentary mathematical concepts of simple addition and subtraction, if nothing else.
Cripes... I feel so blamed old, now, after blinking incredulously at all of that addlepated, anti-math pants-loading -- ! ;)
Mr. Other wins it
Re-read the actual question at hand -- paying especial attention to that portion obligingly highlighted in red -- and try again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.