[Alex Murphy]

Logically, the only people who should support Romney are those who embrace Obama’s goals, but resent Obama’s failure to achieve them. They want to replace his clumsy, bluntly socialist incompetence with Romney’s more engaging and sweetly deceptive method of attaining the same end....As for the choice between Obama and Romney, it’s the devil’s choice either way. Only evil can come of it.

Thanks for posting this, Jim.

[aruanan]

Logically, the only people who should support Romney are those who embrace Obama’s goals, but resent Obama’s failure to achieve them. They want to replace his clumsy, bluntly socialist incompetence with Romney’s more engaging and sweetly deceptive method of attaining the same end....As for the choice between Obama and Romney, it’s the devil’s choice either way. Only evil can come of it.

Logically, given the choice between the only two guys who have a chance of winning the general election, Obama and Romney, some of those who support Romney are those who want to interrupt Obama's actual assault on the United States of America even though they find Romney deficient in many ways. Logically, by withholding a vote for Romney, at least some of those who increase the disparity of votes in the direction of Obama out of a distaste for Romney are those who believe that a vote that shows how sincere they are but that ends up reelecting Obama is somehow morally less suspect than one that has a greater chance of throwing Obama out of office; that is, they are holding in higher regard their own feelings about what they believe could be a possible danger by Romney rather than stopping an immediate, ongoing assault by Obama. In this case, it's pretty obvious who is at least an unwitting (or witless) friend of Obama.