Posted on 07/16/2012 9:13:27 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Special prosecutor Angela Corey just released more than 120 recorded phone calls that murder suspect George Zimmerman made from the Seminole County Jail...
Also released is the statement of "Witness 9," a woman who says Zimmerman is prejudiced against blacks and that he molested her when she was a child.
(Excerpt) Read more at m.globalgrind.com ...
I know, and I get your point.
It's just a bug a boo of mine seeing our Justice System corrupted this way, not that this hasn't been happening for a long while though.
The system isn't about truth, it's about building careers and reputations to earn millions.
It really ticks me off to see high profile cases tried in the court of public opinion rather then the court room where it belongs.
Thanks for the ping Uncle Chip.
This whole thing is so far out of hand, I can’t believe this is happening in the USA.
BTW, did you notice in the key words “nifongism”?
LOL!
Something is wrong with the state’s newest discovery release. The full 284 page release is somehow not available despite them saying so. There appear to be two glaring sensitive areas that they are trying to hide:
1] Despite the state claiming that the entire autopsy has been released, there is no toxicology report. [Martin’s drug use]
2]And Tracy Martin’s original phone company phone bill is absent. Instead they substituted a cut and paste phone bill. [Martin’s phone contacts and whether he was really on the phone with Dee Dee during those times alleged]
All this other stuff was and is just so much smoke and mirrors.
Chip, I do not believe this for a minute. I have a great respect for O’Mara. There is not a dishonest bone in his body. Had he known about that account, he would have revealed it to the court. What do you think?
Ron, I agree with you. But this is not new. It is not as though this is a new law. It has been this way for years. I always cringe when they release these tapes and take the risk of tainting the jury pool. But again, the inmates are told and told again that they have no reason to expect any privacy and these phone calls are taped and are then part of the public record. I cannot imagine how O’Mara felt when he heard these tapes. This can drive a defense atty crazy.
Chip, I have not read your posts re: the molestation charge but it should not be admissable. Even if true, they were both children and has nothing to do with this case. And I have a real problem with the story. I am not calling her a liar and I know there is alot I do not know but........ there are problems with this story I think. The jury surely will not hear any of this hopefully.
“I was 16 when my wife was BORN.”
Well. . . argh. . .nope. . .can’t do it. . .too many jokes possible on that one.
;-)
Chip, do you remember in the second bail hearing, O’Mara told the judge that Zimmerman should have stood up during his wife’s testimony and said to him out loud that what she was saying was not true. The judge said...”at least a tug on the sleeve.” And O’Mara said, “Yes, at least a tug on the sleeve.” There is no way O’Mara knew before that first bail hearing about the account.
Guilty or not guilty?
It's tape #30 and everyone can hear it for themselves. It's the Florida Sunshine Law, you know. And it cannot be hidden.
O'Mara is an officer of the court and there is a tape #30 indicating that he knew about the Paypal account and atleast $37,000 in it as early as April 14th, one week before the April 20th bond hearing, and that tape was in the hands of the prosecution for 3 months, and O'Mara and the state and court have the audacity to berate the defendant and his wife for not telling something that they all already knew that the officer of the court O'Mara knew before the hearing.
That, my friend, is audacity -- and duplicity. The only people who can lie in court and get away with it are lawyers -- and they have lied bigtime here.
So why would the prosecution want her as a witness at all. They can't possibly think that she would help their case in the least. I think they did it because she is a Zimmerman after all and this further disparages the Zimmerman clan.
Guilty of DUI and being a nutcase.
http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Florida/Seminole-County-FL/Cristina-Meza.2640223/details/
Everyone in that courtroom knew about it and they were all playing dumb. When the subject was breached in open court why didn't he tug on Zimmerman's sleeve and ask him about it??? Because he knew about it already and everyone else did as well and they were just feigning ignorance until they had filed for indigent status.
Then they would use her testimony during sentencing. They will not..should not...be able to use her in the case in chief.
Then they would use her testimony during sentencing. They will not..should not...be able to use her in the case in chief.
It is so difficult for me to believe that O’Mara lied or that he stood by and listened to Zimmerman and his wife lie to the court. That is a crime. Perjury. And he stood by and allowed them to do so?? I really liked O’Mara, Chip. And yes, I know about the Fla Sunshine Law. I am pondering.....Just the thought of him allowing them to commit perjury. The chance it would be found out...does irreparable harm to his reputation. Still pondering......And the harm it did to the Zimmermans. He had to know it would not serve them well. As I said in an earlier post, there is not a judge in Fla who does not know they lied to the court. So it truly does them no good to change judges. And I like this judge...But what do I know?
The DUI arrest was in 2007. Do we know what its ultimate disposition was?
O'Mara certainly came across as the polished professional at pains to make sure the case was handled absolutely correctly.
However, everybody knew about GZ's web site and the PayPal account before he was arrested. Indeed, his first lawyers mentioned the site when they announced their withdrawal from the case. So, how did O'Mara manage to get a week into the case without asking George, Now about this PayPal account ... ? Why didn't the prosecutors at the bail hearing want to hear from Shellie's brother in law about the account balance?
I was not aware that Zimmerman’s first attys mentioned the website. Now, knowing they did, shows O’Mara had to. I cannot imagine what he was thinking. For it to be so public then, he took a huge risk standing by and allowing perjury. It was O’Mara’s responsibility then to make the court aware of the account. I do not remember what Zimmerman’s wife said about the brother in law’s availability. Can you tell me, please? I remember her saying he would be the one who would know how much was in it. Even at that time, I knew she had to be lying. But never did I think O’Mara knew about the amt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.