Posted on 07/10/2012 2:39:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
There are always schmucks like that.
I agree.
I find the claim that supporting Romney gets a person zotted pretty funny. Romney people are free to post articles, voice their support, etc. But if you voice reservations about Mitt, look out!
That's correct; I won't.
That's correct; I won't.
The troll quality has been truly pathetic lately.
This is utterly deranged.
It is arresting to imagine a Romney White House, inevitably filled with as many former Bain colleagues as each of his other public ventures have been: The PowerPoints, the 80-20 jargon, the clinical separation of decision-making from ideology, the detachment of those decisions from moral consequence, a persistent blind spot for people as people. It would represent the final ascension of a perfectly American type, one that has already remade the culture of business. I once asked a Bain colleague of Romney’s how Romney thought of his own core competence. “I think Mitt thinks he’s good at being Mitt Romney,” the colleague said.
Those who vociferously campaign against Romney on this site (and there are a number of such folks) want him to lose and are deliberately trying to help bring this about. If Romney loses Obama wins. Thus campaigning against Romney on this site supports Obama. It is a matter of simple logic.
That those who are ABO are selling out their conservative principles is official FR dogma, coming right from the top. For some time it was a bannable offense to say that one was voting for the GOP nominee. Now saying this merely unleashes a swarm of attackers who deride the intellect and character of any who think Obama would be worse for America than Romney and plan to vote accordingly.
These are the facts.
That is a hilarious claim, given your own history doing just that. Should I pull up examples from your recent posting history?
Go ahead and try. I don't think I've done this once.
Well done, DJ.
Of course He doesn't. Defeatism is un-Biblical.
Only to the Sheeple...Do some research like I did before you call something deranged...
If you haven't done the research, you obviously are not qualified to participate in the conversation...
The democrats succeed in cheating and winning elections whne they’re close, because it is the narrow window of manufactured votes which benefits them to stomp on the legitimate votes. There is a clear effrot by some to make this election as close as can be, even in blue states. Is it because there are many blue states where the Soros Spanish vote counting company will be reporting the vote results? I wonder ... and in red states, if the vote for Romney can be reduced, in those states the cheating potential becomes more viable to turn the results by cheating.
Okay.
Easy.
This is utterly deranged.
LOL, we don't follow Romney because of his views on American Exceptionalism, and you say it's deranged.
I seem to recall you were one of them ~ right?!
As always, you are completely wrong.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2905011/posts?page=271#271
There you knock FR because it won’t follow you into Romneyville?
Heck, here’s a link for otehrs to browse at their liesure:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:rogueyam/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
Trisham, conservative women have always been the feminists. We have men in our lives because we want them, not out of necessity. We don’t look to a leader of any type in order to form our thoughts. We don’t step all over our men in order to succeed, nor do we need them in order to succeed. We are not afraid or ashamed of our feminine appearance and we enjoy having the door opened for us.
So yeah, another “feminist”.
The U.S. Presidential election on November 6th, 2012 is a binary choice.
THAT is Realville.
This is the way of reason and of true patriotism.
All of this defeatism and apocalyptic talk is for poseurs.
The tea party movement started from nothing three short years ago. At the time the leftists were rolling, talking about a "progressive realignment" that would last generations, and talking about "the death of the Republican Party".
In 2010 the tea party movement knocked the leftists right onto their butts and they haven't gotten back up yet.
However now, just because we had no attractive, unifying conservative standard-bearer step forward to run for the 2012 GOP nomination, the ABRs on this site want to declare that the greatest grassroots conservative movement of our lifetimes is finished, and the whole Republic is doomed.
Nuts!
Romney is not, nor was ever a Conservative.
He is for bannign guns, homosexual marriage, Romneycare/Obamacare.
He speaks out both sides of his mouth AND other orifices.
At the same time.
But hey, we’re supposed to just follow him, right?
And then what?
What will you say when he starts his liberal pandering AGAIN?
Will you apologize, or will you go full rabid zealot on us for opposing him just as much as we opposed Obama’s liberal actions?
The choice between two evils is still evil.
We had Conservatives in this race, people like you chased them out.
Or frauded them out of delegates, like in Florida.
And we are not suposed to notice this or say anything?
Bite me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.