The numbers work better with an Obie win, the the GOP gains seats in 2014 and we can try to run an actual conservative in 2016. Putting a socialist with an R after his name in the White House give the libs total control. I don’t vote socialist, EVER, I don’t care what letter comes after their names, all socialists are scum and bad for the country, they can’t save the country, because they’re the problem.
But what's to stop the same old pattern repeating: Conservative A and Conservative B split the conservative primary vote, allowing RINO C to take the nomination.
Bingo.
The worst is that ABO is risking a landslide for Romney -- even Rush talks about how weak and vulnerable and desperate Obama is. So instead of taking advantage of that, wherein on a split vote plurality, Obama could very conceivably get in office with a large majority of the popular vote cast against him and LACKING in spades any kind of mandate, and of having confidence in our Republican Congress to steamroll that kind of humiliated, despised president ...
... ABO seriously dangerously risks getting Romney in on a landslide. We'd all know it was a referendum on Obama ... and while it's all about Obama now, by the end of 2013, and 2014, it would be all about Romney. He and the GOP-e and moderate Republicans and Democrats would point to his landslide as a popular mandate FOR Romney's "progressive style of governing." And the numbers would back them up. And Rush could pontificate until he was blue in the face and it wouldn't phase Romney or Moderates in the slightest.
I'm voting to prevent Romney from getting that landslide, and I'm banking on a pretty good bet that enough Democrats are going to defect from Obama to give him no more than a weak plurality. Either way, the candidate will lack any numbers to back up claims of having a "mandate." With Romney, we had all BETTER pray that if he wins, it's only on a weak plurality where he is denied any grounds for claiming a mandate.
There is no voting "against" Obama, there is only voting FOR government tyranny under "Republican" to replace him. I refuse to vote for that. I will be praying for a plurality and voting for it, too.
You're joking, right?
Have you been paying attention to what's going to happen with four more years of Obama?... a dictator-wanna-be who has no respect for the rule of law or the responsibilities of the three branches of government?
My husband and I own a small business. The only thing that keeps us going is the (American) will to fight another day.
Perfectly put, discostu.
Sorry, Rush, but I'm not going to join you in supporting a liberal this time. You just do whatever Karl Rove tells you to do and I'll check back in on you again right after the election to hear your explanation for why the GOP lost again.