Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trailhkr1

Okay, that may be true. I’m not trying to imply anything other than I’m taking your word for it.

Let me run this by you though.

1. Homeowner gets city complaint about prayer meetings in home
2. Homeowner requests permit to build on property in response
3. Homeowner states new structure is only a game room
4. City buys off on it

My question is this. Why would the city buy off on the game room plan in the first place? They know he’s under pressure to conform to city codes regarding meetings? The same city department that is explaining to him what his code violations are, simply misses the connection between existing complaints and the inadequate plans for a new structure?

This leaves me scratching my head.


50 posted on 07/10/2012 2:49:35 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
"""Homeowner states new structure is only a game room"""

Wondering where is the lie in this. Game Room/fellowship hall, same/same. For the most part it is probably used by his family as a game room throughout the week, as it should, being that he owns it.

I see no problem in his wording it as a game room.

101 posted on 07/12/2012 12:20:17 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson