He says they got married so that Stanley Ann could "provide legitimacy to the baby's birth."
And then he argues that Stanley Ann then didn't USE this legitimacy in the one place that was the whole purpose of the contrived marriage - to name Obama Sr. as the father on the birth certificate.
If the whole point of the marriage was to give legitimacy to the baby (from Ann's point of view) and help Sr. with his immigration status (from his point of view), then it makes absolutely NO sense at all that she then wouldn't go ahead and fill in her "husband's" name on the birth certificate.
A much more likely scenario that fits the facts:
Obama Sr., by all accounts a playboy, has a one-night stand (or maybe a two- or three-night stand) with Stanley Ann, who was among his conquests at the University of Hawaii.
When a baby resulted, Obama Sr. hestitatingly agrees to marry Stanley Ann.
At some point after the February ceremony Obama Sr. discovers that she had also been having sex with the much older Frank Marshall Davis. In addition to disgusting him, that raised a serious question in his mind as to whether he was really the father of the baby. And so from the point he learned about the Stanley Ann-Frank Marshall Davis sexual activity, he simply ignored Stanley Ann and her baby, at least until many years later when the boy was ten years old.
Absent a DNA test, to this day there may be no way of knowing which man's (or even someone else's) sperm fathered the baby.
What then happened? We know that Stanley Ann never appeared with the baby at the location her parents were living, according to a daughter of the family who lived there and from whom they were renting rooms.
And she didn't live with Obama Sr. He filled out an immigration form at the end of August 1961 in which he listed his family members and at that time was not even aware he had a new son.
It seems extremely implausible that Stanley Ann would check out of a hospital in Hawaii and NOT go live with the newborn at either her parents or her "husband".
The first place she is seen by anyone with the infant is in Seattle in August 1961.
Did the reckless girl go to Kenya (unaware of the first wife) to see the Obama grandparents to pressure Obama Sr. to take her back? Or did she have the baby at a home for troubled mothers across the border in Canada and then return to Seattle? And then grandma Toot submitted a dodgy affidavit of home birth that Obama Jr. has been trying to cover up ever since?
the widespread cover ups, forgeries, perjuries and records scrubs are way too extensive to cover a mere illegitimate birf
illegitimacy would bolster his street creds
There is NO RECORD of a February marriage btw Dunham & Obama.
Response: It does not matter as their alleged progeny is still a disastrous B*stard.
I speculated long ago the real secret was that 0 was a bastard.
Obama’s father was forced to leave the country when Harvard reported to the State Department that he was not attending to his studies. They said he spent all his time drinking and womanizing, and dropped him from the PhD program. If he had at least showed up for classes wonst in while and made even the most nugatory effort, he would probably still be living in the U.S., probably in Massachusetts, near his brother and sister. Even though the purported purpose of the program he was enrolled in was to dip the future leaders of developing countries in the holy water fountains of the Ivy League, so they would have nice Ivy League accents when they came back to serve as parasites-in-residence on Turtle Bay.
An out-of-wedlock birth would not be worth the millions Obama has spent to keep from producing a valid birth certificate.
He admitted in the fake biography that details of the marriage, or if there was one, were murky.
Michelle called his mother “single” when he was born in one of her campaign appearances.
Simply does not work as a valid hypothesis. Most of his voters see out-of-wedlock birth as perfectly acceptable anyway.
Obummer does not resemble Obama Sr in the least ... he does resemble Frank Marshall Davis, and yes, Ann Dunham.
From what I have read, there is no evidence they ever even lived together. Obama’s whole life is a fabrication and Americans are idiots for not seeing that.
I don’t buy it. Even if his parents weren’t married, Obama can hardly be blamed for that. Weren’t Bill Clinton’s parents unmarried? Besides, liberals think it’s just fine to have babies out of wedlock. Mustn’t judge, by all means! If anything, being born out of wedlock would only give BO more liberal sympathy and cred.
No. There has to be a bigger reason he’s hiding the real birth certificate.
I don’t think they were ever married, though there is a “divorce.” maybe they did some kind of tribal marriage. But probably not. However, it doesn’t matter. In Obama’s own book, he says he never really wanted to know whether his parents were actually married. So it isn’t worth covering up a birth certificate for that reason.
Occam’s razor has Stanley giving birth in Canada. She was first seen in Seattle, and baby Barack has had document problems his whole life. She was probably going to give him up at the unwed mother’s home in Vancouver, but decided in a rare fit of “love” to keep the baby.
A few things about the marriage to Sr. are still a little suspect. One is that, as far as I know, there has never been a copy of the marriage cert. I know that there was no engagement, marriage app., or marriage announcement in either Honolulu newspaper. I know that Sr. listed multiple Honolulu addresses in his INS records, but in the Polk directories he listed only the one address. No where, except in the “newspaper birth announcements” was there a hint of Sr. living at the address listed for the Dumhams in the Polk directories. Stanley Ann was listed in both the Honolulu Polk and the Polk in WA for the 1961-1962 canvas. She is NOT listed as a “Mrs.” in the Honolulu Polk, but is a Mrs. in the Seattle WA Polk. Here is what I wrote about that awhile back on my blog:
-Then she is also published (listed) in the 1961-1962 Seattle Wash. Polk where she moved after only having lived in Hawaii a short time (and what, six months after marrying?). So, back then the info for the Polks was collected-according to what I’ve been able to find out- much like a census. A combo of mailed forms and door to door info collectors. So, lets get into the way back machine, shall we? Hawaii collects some info over a period of months. Then they mail it in to the mainland, likely be ship, but perhaps by air. Then it goes in queue to be inspected and set to print. MANUALLY. Remember that this is 1961. When did the Polk actually end up being printed? For example, was the 1961-1962 Polk printed in early 1962? How useful is a directory in which the info is already a year old by the time it could possibly have been printed? I don’t know. Just something that seems weird to me. Stanley is in both the Honolulu and the Seattle Polks for the same time frame, 1961-1962. Just how damn long did the data collection process go on for those Polks before they got around to the printing? 1961 style.-
Polk was just getting started with computers in 1961 - for auto vin numbers I think - I could not find the exact date when they began to use computers for the directories, but I think it was approx 1963.
I too have always thought it a stretch to have a shotgun wedding, and then not bother to give the slightest appearance of being married.
Then don’t forget Stanley would have to fly to WA with a baby less than a month old AND hunt down an apartment, to all appearances by herself.
“”Or did she have the baby at a home for troubled mothers across the border in Canada and then return to Seattle? And then grandma Toot submitted a dodgy affidavit of home birth that Obama Jr. has been trying to cover up ever since?””
I have always felt this to be a likely scenario IF obama was not actually born in HI. It just fits much better with the anomalies.
I’ve always wondered why their are no Pregnant pic’s of stanley ann.. does anyone else find that strange?
All this is why we need to see the original birth certificate
Too many are coming up with alternate theories to avoid the main fact: We do not know diddly about Obama....the legal full-form birth certificate is the base, the head of the monster.
In a sane world, having a mother named “Stanley” would have disqualified him for serious consideration for high political office all by itself.
Not even on the radar with this theory.
Obama’s story belongs on the Maury show. No where else. Ask him to give up DNA to show where he came from and see what happens. Everyone keeps forgetting that his Kenyan grandmother said she was there and witnessed his birth.
Why do they keep forgetting? Because when they remember, they have to ask for his birth certificate and they do not want to, for if they do, he is gone!