Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Osage Orange
> B.S.!

Please my posts #7 and #18 above. The company was within their rights contractually, so in that sense they did the "right thing". However, I have real trouble with that contract in the first place.

As an employer whose employees read and sign employment contracts, am I expected to ignore those contractual agreements, especially if (as others pointed out) I am liable if someone else gets in trouble in the water my lifeguards are supposed to be guarding?

I think the original contract is morally indefensible.

35 posted on 07/04/2012 5:27:00 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored
Here's what you wrote: The company has to find some more lifeguards, but they too did the right thing.

No they didn't. And don't give me this rope a dope legal baloney trash.

If you didn't have the guts to say it was wrong in the first place....then just can it.

42 posted on 07/04/2012 5:36:39 PM PDT by Osage Orange (8675309)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson