Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opposition to UN arms treaty heats up
The Hill ^ | July 3, 2012 | Julian Pecquet

Posted on 07/03/2012 5:44:46 AM PDT by opentalk

Some 130 lawmakers sent President Obama a letter on Monday expressing their opposition to a pending arms trade treaty if it impinges on gun rights and U.S. sovereignty in any way.

The United Nations this week begins a month-long process of crafting a long-delayed treaty to create international standards for importing and exporting conventional weapons. Proponents say the treaty would bring much of the rest of the world in line with U.S. standards without affecting domestic sales, but gun enthusiasts are worried.

“The UN's actions to date indicate that the ATT [United Nations Arms Trade Treaty] is likely to pose significant threats to our nationalsecurity, foreignpolicy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights,” reads the letter, which was spearheaded by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.). “

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist

1 posted on 07/03/2012 5:44:49 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: opentalk; marktwain; Joe Brower; MestaMachine; neverdem; Nachum

Get ready for another stab in the back by our internationalist administration.


2 posted on 07/03/2012 5:55:07 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Why would the U.S. get involved in this? I’m sure we have all sorts of import/export laws covering firearms already. What benefit is there to the U.S.?


3 posted on 07/03/2012 5:56:49 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
...but gun enthusiasts are worried.

Shouldn't those attempting to forcibly remove the enthusiasts' guns be worried?

4 posted on 07/03/2012 6:02:38 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
images

Photobucket

5 posted on 07/03/2012 6:09:04 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Just the fact that it’s a U.N. treaty is enough to reject it, but there is also the CNUTT to consider.

(Camel’s Nose/edge of tent bit.)


6 posted on 07/03/2012 6:16:31 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Click on image to download PDF file of poster.

7 posted on 07/03/2012 6:19:49 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Its a Soros dream ....


8 posted on 07/03/2012 6:19:55 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

1. A treaty requires approval by 2/3 of the Senate.

2. No treaty, even if unanimously approved by the Senate, will carry any force of law if it violates other provisions of the Constitution.

This abomination won’t get past the Senate by that margin, and I would hope that the R’s will filibuster a bit anyway, just to push it into next year when they’ve got more seats and can reject it by a bigger margin.

I won’t mention the SCOTUS on this issue - its gotten to the point where if a majority opinion says that the sky is blue, I look up to verify it.


9 posted on 07/03/2012 8:14:00 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Bibi to Odumbo: Its not going to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson