Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for John Roberts
The Weekly Standard ^ | 6:00 AM, Jun 29, 2012 | JAY COST

Posted on 06/29/2012 9:04:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Many conservatives are feeling betrayed by the chief justice's vote to uphold Obamacare. But there's a counterintuitive case to be made that John Roberts's decision is largely a victory for conservatives.

Every time I visit Washington, D.C., I am struck by a single, terrible thought: It is not just that conservatives are losing the various battles over big government, but they have been losing the war for generations. The most conservatives are ever able to do is tinker at the margins – and celebrating small victories like lowering marginal tax rates is a sign of just how low our sights are set.

Why has this happened? After all, this was a country founded in direct opposition to unlimited governmental power. How have we arrived at a point when the feds can do just about anything they want?

It is because, at critical moments in the nation’s history, the advocates of limited government were on the losing side of the political equation, and the opposition was very effective at consolidating its victory. Not only did big government advocates implement policy changes, they also brought about huge structural innovations to the way the government functions.

The progressives of the early 1900s managed this with the 16th Amendment, legalizing the income tax and opening up whole avenues of power that had been previously off limits. The political genius of that move must be admired: The left got its hands on the government for a relatively short period of time, but it sure made hay while the sun was out. We’re still paying the price today -- quite literally. Similarly, the New Deal took advantage of a national emergency to ram through ......

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; benedictroberts; deathpanels; jaycost; obamacare; scotus; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 last
To: Salvation
Roberts played the long game, in my opinion.

And you condone such judicial gamesmanship? I thought a SC justice was supposed to decide whether or not a law was repugnant to the Constitution.

181 posted on 06/30/2012 1:43:52 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
He should be if he was IMPEACHED

Good stinkin' luck with that. Even if he were impeached, it would be a waste of time and the backlash would be damaging to the Right.

182 posted on 06/30/2012 2:08:16 PM PDT by oyez ( .Apparently The U.S. CONSTITUTION has been reduced to the consistency of quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
I am still meditating on the "Happening"

I wanted it all killed!

But taking away the commerce clause has some merit.

And if it helps defeat Obama...then that should help.

183 posted on 06/30/2012 2:09:33 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: oyez

Thta is part of the problem only the right cares about backlash. So they never accomplish anything!


184 posted on 06/30/2012 2:14:55 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
Roberts put a fork into the Constitution and declared it dead.< /i>

There is value in that statement. Roberts can declare it dead, but The Constitution is on life support and it Obama retains his office, there will funeral on November 7.

185 posted on 06/30/2012 2:19:17 PM PDT by oyez ( .Apparently The U.S. CONSTITUTION has been reduced to the consistency of quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
Roberts put a fork into the Constitution and declared it dead.< /i>

There is value in that statement. Roberts can declare it dead, but The Constitution is on life support and it Obama retains his office, there will funeral on November 7.

186 posted on 06/30/2012 2:19:41 PM PDT by oyez ( .Apparently The U.S. CONSTITUTION has been reduced to the consistency of quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
But taking away the commerce clause has some merit.

But we're still stuck with the Raich precedent, about which Thomas concluded in his dissent - "the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers." At best, the so-called Commerce Clause 'victory' means that the line was not expanded beyond Raich. Everything in Obamacare - except the mandate - is allowed under current Commerce Clause case law. It's about the hollowest victory I can imagine.

187 posted on 06/30/2012 2:21:07 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Perhaps we can all conclude that it is not possible to defeat obozocare in court -
had Roberts ruled it unconstitutional, do you honestly think it will matter? Obozo and gang will have Roberts to blame in addition to the Rs and Bush, and fan his obots into a frenzy to steal the election again. The ruling will have no effect in future lawsuits because the court will be filled with obzozo’s appointees!
The only way to remove obozocare is to remove obozo.
Keep the ultimate goal in mind as we act.
It should come as no surprise that Roberts rules in favor of obozocare. Haven’t we witnessed all the judges ruling in favor of obozo eligibility even when they failed to show up for the hearing?
At least Roberts gives them tremendous headache in having to explain it is not a tax - they are still insisting that it is not a tax! They don’t want people to think it is a tax! They are still arguing with the CJ even tho he rules in their favor!
There is no way to win except to vote out the d*** usurper.
Take this as the biggest incentive to vote them out!
OR do not complain when obozo stays in power and gives you more Roberts!

OK enough argument about what Roberts has done and whether he is right or wrong. No amount of yelling/complaining will get rid of him or obozo or his gang.
VOTE OUT OBOZO AND the blood supply to his czars and agencies will be cut off! And the supreme will not have to rule on so much unconstitutional legislation!


188 posted on 06/30/2012 2:28:58 PM PDT by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Wittle justice Wobert changed his mind so as not to hurt the feelings of the “nice” Muslim President Obobo. Isn’t that so precious ? Prolly now wittle Wobert and his wife and two adopted children get a cool ride on a big ole jetliner called Airfarce One. awww,how cool is that.
189 posted on 07/01/2012 1:25:40 PM PDT by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
But taking away the commerce clause has some merit.

The Commerce Clause was not touched at all. Mark Levin clearly explained in great detail why the Commerce Clause was not effected in any way.

That is an outright lie being spread by elitist fake Conservatives like Charles K and others.

190 posted on 07/01/2012 11:29:10 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson