Do we need to point out the illegal act of mislabeling it so it could be passed in the Senate....just another O-nipulation?
As we work to elect more conservative representation, where do we encourage those already elected to go? (I know, but seriously)
Ostensibly, I'd think this the easiest route to go. Eric Cantor has already started proceedings in the House for July, but it would have to pass both houses. I don't see that happening before November with the current Senate. But why rely just on that? A lawsuit in addition to ongoing congressional action, just to spur it on if nothing else, may be worthwhile. By whom? Someone on the right who's prepared, energized, to take such action. Horowitz? Judicial Watch? ?????
Do we need to point out the illegal act of mislabeling it so it could be passed in the Senate....just another O-nipulation?
Absolutely. Not only that, but the illegality of initiating a funding bill in the Senate. Every corrupt aspect of this legislation has to see the light of day.
As we work to elect more conservative representation, where do we encourage those already elected to go?
They're either with us or against the Constitution. The House won't be a problem. The Senate? Moreso a problem (even after November). But if we can make this a mandate come November, I'd hope anyone currently in office, who wants to remain in office come their next election, will heed the tea leaves.
You know...I have a problem with saying it was wrongfully labeled. It was not wrongfully labeled. The history of this shows/demonstrates in plain view a willful intent to commit ‘fraud’ against the American people.
They(Democrats) denied and denied this as a tax. They manipulated it into the commerce clause etc. Now, the court struck that part down and classified it as a tax. Essentially calling it what it is...bringing a truth to the fraud perpetuated on the American people.