Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican

Exactly right. Roberts needs Kennedy with him to overturn O’care; so he gave Kennedy support on Arizona (something he otherwise would not have done).


45 posted on 06/26/2012 1:11:35 PM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: katieanna

We’re on the same page. And since the AZ case would have been decided the same way with or without Roberts’s vote (4-4 would have resulted in the 9th Circuit opinion being upheld with respect to the three clauses that SCOTUS struck down; the 9th Circuit still would have een overruled 8-0 on section 2(b)), it wasn’t that big of a sacrifice for Roberts.


50 posted on 06/26/2012 1:27:02 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

Goodness. Thanks for just coming out and saying it, because I had no idea what Rush and a few others were trying to imply.

I still have no idea if this is true, though. I guess it’s fun speculation.


66 posted on 06/26/2012 2:08:31 PM PDT by snarkytart (http://www.freerepubli224%2C1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson