Posted on 06/26/2012 11:38:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
I do not believe the gay rumors, I have no knowledge to form an opinion nor do I care to.
However, why would John Roberts care if people knew he was gay? He could not be impeached for it.
I think I understand what Rush was referring to, if correctly quoted, and it has nothing to do with homosexuality.
If I recall correctly, John sings “You’ll pay money just to see yourself with Dr. Robert,” and that he says “Bob Robert” instead of “Dr. Robert” after “he does everything he can.”
(And, on a grammatical note, it’s spelled “you’re” instead of “your” in the second, third, fifth, seventh and eighth verses.)
I trust that Justice Roberts won’t try to become Dr. Roberts and will decide the case solely on Congress’s enumerated powers, not on some notion of having to “save health care.”
What is it then?
Not moot. They may lose Obamacare but their long-term game is to intimidate the Justice into Voting Left on the next case. And the one after that.
There is going to big a big party in DC next Wednesday. I understand they are going to Barbecue The Constitution.
“I think I understand what Rush was referring to, if correctly quoted, and it has nothing to do with homosexuality.”
Rush’s opinion is always interesting. Good to post somewhere on FR. But this item is NOT breaking news.
Maybe you forgotten the 2005 nomination announcement:
As if anyone who matters cares what “politico” thinks.
Some people hear “gay rumor” and OBSESS. It’s childish and stupid.
why are the leftists attacking roberts with such specificity?
is he this thin skinned? do the leftists believe that? seriously?
Rush knows.
He is much too confidently telling us how wrong the media can be, unless he knows something we don’t know. Not one story about how a lib might vote with the conservatives on the court?
Rush knows what the individual mandate decision is, and what he’s telling us here is that it’s going to be a 6-3 decision, or better, to strike down the mandate. One or more of the libs went against Obama.
we have trolls trying to spread character assasination.
Do these morons at Politico not know the decision has been finalized probably since April and the rest has been about forming the sides and writing the opinions and dissents. It’s like the scene from Last Hurrah when the returns start coming in and Pat O’Brien and Jim Gleason start heading back to the streets to find a way stop the voting trends. Spencer Tracy has to remind them that the votes are in and only have to be counted.
Straight out of the Alinsky playbook.
Do these morons at Politico not know the decision has been finalized probably since April and the rest has been about forming the sides and writing the opinions and dissents. It’s like the scene from Last Hurrah when the returns start coming in and Pat O’Brien and Jim Gleason start heading back to the streets to find a way stop the voting trends. Spencer Tracy has to remind them that the votes are in and only have to be counted.
Do these morons at Politico not know the decision has been finalized probably since April and the rest has been about forming the sides and writing the opinions and dissents. It’s like the scene from Last Hurrah when the returns start coming in and Pat O’Brien and Jim Gleason start heading back to the streets to find a way stop the voting trends. Spencer Tracy has to remind them that the votes are in and only have to be counted.
Couldn’t Roberts find some “penumbra” finding that Obama care is unconstitutional?
Only liberals are allowed to be daring. They can take prayer out of schools, make the crime of abortion legal, protect pornography under the first amendment etc. but conservatives are supposed to be timid little lambs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.