Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NeverEVERKerry

10:25

Amy:
Because the FCC failed to give Fox or ABC fair notice prior to the broadcast that fleeting expletives and momentary nudity would be indecent, the Commission’s standards as applied to these broadcasts were vague.

10:25

Amy:
Because it resolves these cases under the due process clause, it does not involve the First Amendment implications or reconsider Pacifica at this time.


113 posted on 06/21/2012 7:25:07 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: NeverEVERKerry

10:25

Tom:
The decision is very narrow. The analysis section of the opinion is only 5 pages long. It says simply that the FCC didn’t give advance notice. It doesn’t decide the big questions of the constitutionality of the current policy.


115 posted on 06/21/2012 7:25:39 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: NeverEVERKerry

NO DECISION TODAY!


117 posted on 06/21/2012 7:26:03 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson