Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NeverEVERKerry

10:25

Tom:
The decision is very narrow. The analysis section of the opinion is only 5 pages long. It says simply that the FCC didn’t give advance notice. It doesn’t decide the big questions of the constitutionality of the current policy.


115 posted on 06/21/2012 7:25:39 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: NeverEVERKerry

10:26

Amy:
It is not addressing the constitutionality of the current indecency policy and the Court leaves the Commission free to modify its policy in light of its determination of the public interest and leaves the courts free to review the current policy or any changes thereto in light of what the policy is and how it is applied.

10:26

Amy:
That is all for today.

10:26

Kali:

The Court has posted the FCC opinion here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1293f3e5.pdf

10:27

Amy:
No more opinions, according to Lyle. No health care coming today, no Arizona.


120 posted on 06/21/2012 7:26:43 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: NeverEVERKerry

Will the announcement rotation start over on Monday with the Wise Latina?


125 posted on 06/21/2012 7:28:36 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Steyn: "One can argue about whose fault it is, but not ... whose responsibility it is: it's his")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson