Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Sarah Palin says that Obama did not respect the balance of power in the federal government when he issued his executive order last week on immigration, that he is now just telling Americans what he deems best by fiat. It was so blatant that she also suggested that we go back and talk to some of his former students because it’s clear Obama doesn’t understand our constitutional process.
She was also asked about criticism that she didn’t mention Romney in her speech at Right Online. But her reason was simple, that it would have violated the ground rules based on AFP’s legal status as a non-profit. But she makes very clear where she stands and said that if the vote were had today, she wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney over Obama and maintains she’s always held the position of anybody but Obama.
Watch below Video at link:
That really is kindergarten and very immature thinking - the minds of mittbot don't raise to the level of first grade.
I WILL NEVER FOR YOUR POS LIBERAL pro baby killing candidate and associate myself with such evil. You take the blood on your hands as you support a candidate who endorses it and enforces it - you are an accomplice to murder. Evil likes to take as many accomplices with him as he can.
Pure and simple
There is NOTHING pure and simple about voting for romney - it is EVIL and not simple when judgement time comes. And now you have your part in DEGRADING AMERICA just like obama.
My goal is to make sure that whichever president they get is as weak as possible, and the best way I can do that with my vote at the top of the ticket is to deny statist Romney my sanction and be on record doing it. If enough Americans disgusted with this charade vote third party and force a plurality on the winner, conservative Republicans will have a much easier time opposing the statist administration of whichever guy wins, when that guy is snickered at internationally and despised nationally because the majority of Americans voted against him, and when that guy is constantly having to watch his back in his own party because everyone knows how weak his support is.
You'd best pray for a plurality.
Here is Romney "dabbling" into liberal issues.
"I believe abortion should be safe and LEGAL in this country; I have since my mom took that position in 1970 as a US Senate candidate."
~Mitt Romney
"I believe that my record, my life, is a clear indication of my support and insistence on anti-discrimination [gay rights] and on efforts to assure equal rights for all."
~Mitt Romney
"I believe that all people should have the right to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation."
~Mitt Romney
"Look, I was an Independent during the time of Reagan/Bush. I'm not trying to return to the time of Reagan/Bush."
~Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney tries to convince voters he is more liberal than Ted Kennedy.
I meant to say equating Romney to Obama is not rational.
We have an election to win. And a country to keep.
Mittens has won the nomination.
Now he needs to win the White House and the opportunity to disprove our predictions about him!
And we need to make sure enough congressmen and senators are elected to make sure he etches the right sketch!
That’s it! Well said, cynwoody.
Good for you - crawl all you want on glass - Idiot.
No he has NOT! - Mittbots lie like just like romney or just plain stupid - the kind he draws.
Post 347 for you.
I clearly understand you will never vote for Romney, but my logic 100% correct. You do the math.
Obama needs to win more votes than Romney to keep his office. There will not be a 3rd party president. The next president will either be Obama or Romney.
If the Conservative base starves Romney of votes by voting 3rd party, then he will lack the votes to win the election. So who wins if not Romney?
Obama wins.
So when you and many thousands of other conservatives vote 3rd party rather than Romney, you are causing Obama to win the election. By not voting for Romney, you are not stopping the election of Obama.
That is something even a kindergarten child can understand.
When members of the Democrat Party voter base vote 3rd party, they are not voting to prevent Romney from being elected. It translates into their voting for Romney.
No, it is not a direct vote. It is an indirect vote.
If they vote for Obama, it cancels out a vote for Romney.
If they write in Hillary Clinton, then their vote does not cancel out a vote for Romney, and Romney gains against Obama.
In the same way, if you vote 3rd party, then the Romney vote you would have cast that cancels out a Dem Obama vote, no longer cancels that vote.
In the end, Obama racks up more votes and wins.
If Obama wins, and you helped cause that win, then you “voted for Obama”.
Now you can argue the specifics all day that technically you did not cast a ballot vote for Obama, and you would be technically correct. You did not actually vote to put him over the top.
But every 3rd party vote like yours that does not go to Romney, reduces his vote tally in your state, making it easier for the people voting for Obama to give him the win.
If Obama wins, he wins. It really doesn’t matter if you cast an actual vote or just a virtual vote by withholding your vote from his opponent. He still wins. You still helped him win.
Now in your case, you are perfectly fine with an Obama win. As you stated, your only concern is that should he win, he wins by the slimmest margin.
And what does that achieve?
When Obama passes an Executive Order requiring all cars to be electric powered, then how does your slim margin matter? You still have Obama in dictatorial power.
We will not be able to repeal Obamacare if he wins, even by a single slim vote. Repealing Obamacare matters to me. Maybe not so much to you.
So if you get 4 more years of Obama instead of Romney, what changes.
Both are abortionists.
Both are pro gay marriage.
But Obama is a radical communist Muslim traitor bent on transforming the USA into a socialist nation, he will re-distribute all wealth to the lower classes, he would bring Sharia law if he could, he supports it all over the middle east toppling Mubarak and Kadaffi to instill it.
So you have 2 pro gay abortionists. So you are going to defy the GOP pro gay abortionist and you will end up with the radical communist Muslim Dem pro-UN, economy wrecking, anti-oil, treasonous anti-military, pro gay abortionist.
I’m having a very hard time seeing what you gain by that.
That is true.....the biggest bullies and harpies here do fit your description
Is this more of your fuzzy thinking from that mittbot head of yours.? They are NOT abortionists. Can't you get anything right? Even a first grader knows better than that!
You’re arguing with a Moby trying to sew dissent.
Every thinking conservative understands the time to express their views is during the primaries.
Once a candidate is selected we have to face the reality of a two party system and vote for the candidate closest to our side.
Bless you nutmeg - I pray there are enough around who as smart as you and Sarah come November.
I guess you need to be reminded about FR's mission:
Welcome to Free Republic, America's exclusive site for God, Family, Country, Life & Liberty conservatives!
You're obviously on the wrong forum, huckleberry. Back to the DUmp with you.
You just hit the nail on the head, Linda!!!
More than you know, huckleberry.
Are you that clueless?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.