Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney, she affirms it’s ANYBODY. BUT. OBAMA.
The Right Scoop ^ | June 20 2012 | The Right Scoop

Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone

Sarah Palin says that Obama did not respect the balance of power in the federal government when he issued his executive order last week on immigration, that he is now just telling Americans what he deems best by fiat. It was so blatant that she also suggested that we go back and talk to some of his former students because it’s clear Obama doesn’t understand our constitutional process.

She was also asked about criticism that she didn’t mention Romney in her speech at Right Online. But her reason was simple, that it would have violated the ground rules based on AFP’s legal status as a non-profit. But she makes very clear where she stands and said that if the vote were had today, she wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney over Obama and maintains she’s always held the position of anybody but Obama.

Watch below Video at link:


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012election; election2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; palin; romney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 521-531 next last
To: nascarnation

LOL!

Sarah must be a RINO ;)


181 posted on 06/20/2012 7:48:35 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Well first off, let’s not get too carried away please.

I’m a Romney-bot as a second choice. First choice would have been Palin.

Unfortunately she decided for her own reasons not to run. This time...

So I’m stuck rooting for the future of someone I don’t really care one bit about. Except that he’s not Obama.


182 posted on 06/20/2012 7:49:11 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Marcella
Thanks so much, I didn’t know I was a political insider. If I was a political insider wouldn’t that mean I was for Romney? So, you are wrong again.

"I teach election law to Texas Republican county chairs, candidates, and election judges/clerks and study election number statistics. I was the secretary of our county Republican Party for ten years."

LOL! Either you are a liar or an insider.....pick one....

183 posted on 06/20/2012 7:49:37 PM PDT by ScreamingFist (Quiet the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Finny
I pray that American patriots wake up in time to the foolishness of ABO and understand that they would better use their vote to weaken whichever statist authoritarian we are GUARANTEED to get, by voting third party and splitting the vote into such a plurality that the winner goes into office with the majority of Americans on record as voting AGAINST him, making that president vulnerable to his enemies in his own party as well as the opposition party, and giving the conservatives we voted for down-ticket a better chance of dominating him.

Given that Obama and Romney are merely two sides of the same coin, your strategy makes a whole lot of sense. I want whichever statist Socialist who wins this thing, to go into 2013 with the slimmest plurality possible, to rule out any pretense of a mandate.

Unless some miracle happens in Tampa, we've lost the presidency this go round. The decrepit elites have engineered it so the people have no real choice in the overall agenda, going forward. One or the other of their puppets will ensure that it stays on track.

At this point, we need to do all that we can to ensure that Congress is dominated by people who will push back against the compromised White House and the cabal that pulls its strings.

184 posted on 06/20/2012 7:51:37 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I don’t trust her judgment any more than I do anyone else’s. I like her messege and glad she’s on our side but other than that, I don’t give a damn what she says.


185 posted on 06/20/2012 7:51:57 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Of course not. She would never do that! She’s pure.RME


186 posted on 06/20/2012 7:54:39 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
lol! You're not racist. I know a lot of people hate BB because of the prima donna criminals who play the sport; maybe that's it. But the same thing can be said about football, especially here in San Diego where a player gets arrested for some serious crime each season.

I like all sports except soccer. I just can't get into that. But BB is one of my favorites. Could be because I stand 6'8". :-)

187 posted on 06/20/2012 7:55:32 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Patriots = blabbermouths who know where the Caps Lock key is, and think the re-election of Obama justifies their pretend principles


188 posted on 06/20/2012 7:56:45 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Finny; ScreamingFist
Well, there ya go. Go vote for Sarah Palin along with the other two dopes

Well look at this - the screaming wonder is handing out permission slips!! LOL!! Guess he's taking a break from crawling on glass for liberalism.

Go Sarah!

189 posted on 06/20/2012 7:57:15 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

LOL. I bet she votes for him because the alternative is so much worse. She’s not stupid.


190 posted on 06/20/2012 7:58:10 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

:)


191 posted on 06/20/2012 7:59:32 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Finny
ABOers can pretend they're voting "against" Obama, though they will in fact be giving a politicain most of them despise, their CONSENT. I refuse to give my consent to liberalism, and instead will be voting FOR going on offense.

Voting for Virgil Goode is about as stupid as it can get.

It astounds me that people that claim to be voting on principle, that presume to know that GOD will support their actions to ensure the Kenyan Communist gets a second term, will say anything to rationalize what will be the dumbest decision they've made in years.

You should have started working for a GOP candidate of your choice or a third-party one three years ago. Or support the nominee and start working NOW for you choice in 2016. Throwing a tantrum eight months before the election and taking your toys home to vote for HR PufNStuf is ridiculous.

192 posted on 06/20/2012 7:59:32 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I won’t respond to the rest of your post but Palin sain this atthe Iowa Fair on August 11, 2011:

“Could I support someone like Rommey? Yeah.”

And ten months later she is doing it.

I don’t get the problem.

http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/12/palin-at-iowa-state-fair-i%E2%80%99m-still-undecided-on-2012/


193 posted on 06/20/2012 8:00:27 PM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Finny
You're smokin' tonight!

Thanks, Finny. You've been burning up the airwaves pretty good yourself tonight.

I think we're beginning to see a cumulative distillation of reason around here. I see consensus about our forward strategy beginning to coalesce, and a grand unity of purpose ahead.

It may not be Revolution II, but it's going to look something like that.

194 posted on 06/20/2012 8:01:49 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Once Jim called the truce we have seen an influx of Romneybots make their move here

If he hadn't called a truce you Obamabots would just be sitting here still stroking yourselves.

195 posted on 06/20/2012 8:01:49 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

Or the flip side, not talk about it like your post suggests.

Some just can’t stay away from the Mormon issue and discuss his liberal policies...hmmm.


196 posted on 06/20/2012 8:02:23 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: South40

LMAO! Keep shilling for Obama. It’s entertaining to read.


197 posted on 06/20/2012 8:04:50 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Finny; Marcella

You can add me to the list.

I will vote down ticket before I would sell out my princples and vote for that D with an R next to his name.


198 posted on 06/20/2012 8:05:11 PM PDT by Clyde5445
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445

Well I guess we’re a wash then.

I’m voting for Romney.

Because Palin isn’t running.


199 posted on 06/20/2012 8:07:14 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Actually that was (partly) the network doing.

Keep it honest, romney supporter - it was ALL the doing of the organization that asked her to speak at their convention. She's in demand while no one wants the POS Romney.

She would potentially lose tax-free status.

Do you pride yourself on being so uninformed? She has NO tax free status!! Unbelievable. The most uninformed voters are mitt supporters.

Though I have not heard her yet go for Romney...Yet.

Because she hasn't - but you did hear she voted FOR conservative NEWT, the only 'WeThePeople' candidate and Todd campaigned for him.

200 posted on 06/20/2012 8:07:32 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 521-531 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson