Skip to comments.
Is this the end of Eric Holder’s games?
NY Post ^
| 6-20-2012
| Michael A. Walsh
Posted on 06/20/2012 5:15:16 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: henkster
41
posted on
06/20/2012 7:28:11 AM PDT
by
Hotlanta Mike
(Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
To: Sir Napsalot
Obama will “make” a Republican Congress impeach Holder..he needs some more racist ammunition in his belt for the fall campaign.
42
posted on
06/20/2012 7:36:33 AM PDT
by
mo
(If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
To: JAKraig; Truth29; yoe; ProtectOurFreedom
RE :”
Obama/Holders plan might work
According to Drudge, Holder is asking Obama to declare Executive Privilege.
I dont think that will fly very well.”
I recall that 2007 or 2008 there was similar standoff between Pelosi House judiciary (Conyers) and Bush administration and a few refused to testify under the same Privilege and so the Dems voted they were in contempt of congress and referred it to justice department who ignored it.
Then the whole thing went away till Holder took over, then Rove negotiated something so he wouldnt have to testify on TV.
My guess is that after a House vote Republicans will be out of options as long as obama is POTUS.
43
posted on
06/20/2012 7:52:20 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
To: Sir Napsalot
No I don't think Boehner is worried, he knows this 'contempt vote" will just roll off the back of Holder etc. like water. In 2008, the Democratic-led House Oversight Committee found former White House counsel Harriet Miers and Chief of Staff John Bolton in contempt for failing to cooperate with an inquiry into whether a purge of federal prosecutors by the Bush administration was politically motivated. The left doesn't care about facts...their aim is to kill...worried or not the GOP should take a page from their book. Bill Clinton fired all in the justice department when he took office...Bush should have done the same...the oft used "fairness" word means get Republicans to roll over...it doesn't apply to Progressives. (there is no democrat party anymore)
44
posted on
06/20/2012 8:02:40 AM PDT
by
yoe
(Proud to be part of the Tea Party movement.....!!!!!)
To: PapaBear3625
The votes are not “public”. But, let you Representative know that you will expect a public pronouncement on the issue of leadership.
45
posted on
06/20/2012 8:51:21 AM PDT
by
vg0va3
To: sickoflibs; Sir Napsalot; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; ...
Holder committed a heinous criminal act.....get him!!
46
posted on
06/20/2012 8:57:29 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; Sir Napsalot; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; ...
“...get him!!...”
They’re trying. Gotta give Issa a lot of credit. He’s fighting Boehner and others in his own party, as well as the entire DemRat political machine.
Guy’s got balls. Say a prayer for him and the success of his endeavor here. Right now, he and Grassly are the only ones pushing hard on this.
What amazes me are the continued comparisons to Nixon...Nixon was an American, at least. And nobody died during Watergate.
This is just disgusting.
47
posted on
06/20/2012 9:06:53 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: henkster; sickoflibs
“...If this was started by Bush, and ended by you, then you have nothing to hide. Turn over the documents...”
Bingo. Spot-on.
Like they say to us: If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to worry about.
48
posted on
06/20/2012 9:09:03 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale
Holder retracted his claim that Bush AG Mukasey knew F&F.
Lying SOBastids!!!
49
posted on
06/20/2012 9:17:01 AM PDT
by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Sir Napsalot
“...Lying SOBastids...”
Par for the course, brother.
50
posted on
06/20/2012 9:27:21 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: stephenjohnbanker; NFHale; henkster; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; JAKraig
RE ::”
Holder committed a heinous criminal act.....get him!!”
This one is easy,
The House will have their vote, Holder (and obama) will ignore it, the MSM will either ignore it or cite it as more political noise by Republicans. Republicans will use it in fund-raising letters. Democrats will use it in fund-raising letters. Holder will still be attorney general in December. If Romney wins his AG will do nothing about it.
Republicans have no follow-up plan.
51
posted on
06/20/2012 9:28:34 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
To: sickoflibs
For my edification - what IS the next step after a contempt vote?
Is there no law enforcement avenue available other than impeachment?
52
posted on
06/20/2012 9:33:38 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; nhale; henkster; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; JAKraig
RE :”
For my edification - what IS the next step after a contempt vote?
Is there no law enforcement avenue available other than impeachment?”
Good question.
In 2007 or 2008 the Pelosi/Conyers judiciary held similar votes on contempt of GWB WH officials for refusing to testify to them under oath.
The next step is to refer the case to AG Holder for prosecution, in this case they will send him his own House indictment. Then he ignores it. Then Republicans do nothing,
This Boehner House session scores huge points in ‘talk’, but low grades in ‘results’.
Lets see what opinion polls do two weeks after the vote. We got an election coming up and Romney has not moved up in the polls after two bad weeks for Obama and then his late week amnesty announcement.
53
posted on
06/20/2012 9:44:45 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
To: sickoflibs
I would like to see Romney grab a microphone and a camera and make a very public statement -
“If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about. What is this administration hiding, and why?”
Throw the onus on them to “come clean”. Over and over and over again.
54
posted on
06/20/2012 9:48:23 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; nhale; henkster; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; JAKraig
Clarification :technically they were Bush ‘advisors’ not ‘officials’ I believe. The AG still had to testify under oath, but my point is the AG will just ignore the referral/indictment.
55
posted on
06/20/2012 9:50:01 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
To: NFHale; All
We all know the Left’s take on guns.
Here you have a Leftist president covering for a guy who was involved in (evil) gun running.
Yep, that’s right, he was (EVIL) gun running. As THE PRESS would describe them if some guy on the street had committed a crime with them, “FULLY AUTOMATIC LARGE MAGAZINE MILITARY MACHINE GUNS!”
Here’s what the entire Left had to say about that, “ “.
Lefties, “BEST PRESIDENT EVER!” Oh that’s right, he wasn’t vile enough for them. He didn’t follow through with what he promised.
One can only imagine what the Left would really like to back for president.
56
posted on
06/20/2012 9:53:37 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Republicanism: Y1 Rant Y2 Rant Y3 Rant Y4, Oh nevermind, vote for him anyway. Rinse & Repeat!)
To: NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
RE :”
I would like to see Romney grab a microphone and a camera and make a very public statement “
Don't hold your breath. He will do that when he explains what he would do with Obama’s amnesty order as/if POTUS, and what programs he would cut funding from, etc.
You have faith in him?
57
posted on
06/20/2012 9:57:42 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
To: Hotlanta Mike; All
As for Nixon...
At least there was no gun running involved.
At least there were no dead law enforcement officers.
At least there was a citizen in the Oval Office.
At least Nixon had personal documents...
At least we know where Nixon was born.
58
posted on
06/20/2012 9:59:27 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Republicanism: Y1 Rant Y2 Rant Y3 Rant Y4, Oh nevermind, vote for him anyway. Rinse & Repeat!)
To: sickoflibs
“...You have faith in him? ...”
I Didn’t say that.
I said, I’d like to see it happen.
If I was a politician, I’d waste no time in throwing the searchlight back on the other side, and hammer that talking point until it made their noses bleed.
But yeah, you’re right...I’m not going to hold my breath on it. If the next step is to go the AG, and Holder IS the AG, then this is a circle jerk at the end of the day.
But the good thing is, it shines a light and points a finger, and some people who aren’t paying attention might wake up a little.
59
posted on
06/20/2012 10:03:38 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: DoughtyOne
“...We all know the Lefts take on guns...”
Yeah, ultimately it’s TO take all guns.
Good luck with that...
60
posted on
06/20/2012 10:04:22 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson