Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daily Caller Whines That ‘Increasingly Irrelevant’ Palin Hasn’t Endorsed Romney
The Daily Caller ^

Posted on 06/19/2012 12:32:32 PM PDT by Mozilla

Something about that Old Guard and that establishment. There’s a schedule to keep and a list of rules to follow. Apparently, Sarah Palin shredded her copy and it’s starting to rub the media the wrong way.

Despite saying dozens of times over the last year that she would eventually back the GOP nominee in her #1 mission to replace Barack Obama, apparently the media expects more.

An article written by The Hill yesterday notices: “Palin Doesn’t Mention Romney In Address To Conservative Bloggers”.

The Daily Caller reiterates: “Sarah Palin Hasn’t Formally Endorsed Romney Yet” while they also concede that she “has made it concretely clear that she’s opposed to President Barack Obama’s re-election.”

Then, this morning the snark kicked in at the Daily Caller again:

Sarah Palin has become increasingly irrelevant, but her endorsement still remains sought after by GOP candidates. And Mitt Romney has yet to become a recipient of her beneficence, reports TheDC’s Alex Pappas.

Sounds to me like some are starting to get a little grumpy. First, it is absurd to suggest someone is “increasingly irrelevant” (especially with a blog owned by an “increasingly irrelevant” pundit known solely for his abundant collection of bow ties) when you’re beginning the top of the page of your precious blog space to mention it.

If that in and of itself isn’t enough to disprove their claim of increasing irrelevance, we have Palin’s endorsing of Richard Mourdock for Senate in Indiana labeled by the Washington Post at the time as the “highest-profile endorsement yet for the primary challenger and it pits Palin against her old running-mate, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who just cut a radio ad for Lugar.”

(Excerpt) Read more at conservatives4palin.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: badgovromney; conservativepalin; dailycaller; goodgovpalin; loserromney; palin; palin4america; rinoromney; rinos; romney4dnc; romney4obamacare; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Mozilla

I agree with some of the other posters. Palin has been thoroughly trashed in the most personal terms since she came to national attention, and a fair number of her more vicious attackers have been Repubs.

And the Repubs who trash her always turned out to be Romniacs.

Tea Party folk have seen the same thing. They expect to be attacked by Dems. But they were also attacked regularly by Repubs, and the Repubs who attacked the Tea Party folk almost always turned out to be Romniacs.

Then there is the fact that Romney himself has at various times supported almost every one of Obama’s policies.

So, he has made it pretty tough to support him. But Palin has evidently decided, if she can’t support Romney, she can at least help to unseat Obama. So she is doing her part. For the Romniacs to expect her endorsement after the way they treated her is a bit much. Still, she is one of their best allies as she goes after Obama. They don’t deserve her, but its not about them anyway.


21 posted on 06/19/2012 3:13:04 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strider44; gdani

The daughter you reference, Bristol Palin, is an adult, is she not? And how is she an “idiot” or “looking foolish” or do you just object to someone being paid money to appear on television?


22 posted on 06/19/2012 3:42:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

There are some people who will never understand politics.


23 posted on 06/19/2012 3:54:47 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bobo1
Sarah Palin is not “increasingly irrelevant” otherwise they would not be writing about her views. Do these people actually think before they write anything?

Oh they know she is still relevant. They are just trying to convince the sheeple that she is not.
24 posted on 06/19/2012 4:08:06 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

FYI


25 posted on 06/19/2012 4:30:50 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; bobo1

Then Vice President Nixon came back from his losses in 1960 and 1962 and was President of the United States a mere 7 years later. She can easily do so.


26 posted on 06/19/2012 5:38:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

When interviewed last night, Palin was asked point blank whether she supported Romney. She replied that she was a member of “Anybody But Obama”, so of course she would support Romney.


27 posted on 06/20/2012 9:18:19 AM PDT by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

“Unnecessary Force”
by JibJab
starring Sarah Palin, Hillary Clinton, Tina Fey, Jay Leno, and David Letterman.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=AmRZIJ3Q7CQ


28 posted on 06/25/2012 7:39:24 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson