[JustSayNoToNannies]

Even Conservatives disagree about certain aspects of the U. S. Constitution. [...] So when it comes to our laws concerning drugs, I do think it's open to interpretation whether they are Constitutional or not.

I have yet to see a conservative interpretation that supports federal laws on intrastate drug matters. (It's in no way conservative to support the FDR court's Wickard v Filburn "substantial effects" test - which gave us the vast majority of today's federal welfare state.)

Until someone makes a sound enough case to shoot that premise down that they are Constitutional, they will remain on the books.

Of course - my point is that no true conservative can voice support for unconstitutional laws.

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks for the additional comments.

When you come here and protest against those other laws, and put your full efforts into getting them repealed too, perhaps you’ll have a little more credibility with me.

I had to bludgeon you to admit any of them actually existed. Why would I have to do that with a guy who so readily hates all such laws.

Frankly, we both know I shouldn’t.