Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jongaltsr

You are doing it wrong.

Outlaw driving. Swimming. Boating. Airplanes. Electricity. Natural gas.

We can reduce risk to zero if we sit in padded rooms under direct supervision by State licensed sheeple supervisors.


78 posted on 06/14/2012 4:28:36 PM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: DariusBane

I AM NOT ADVERSE TO CHALLENGES AND RISK TAKING.

But taking and endangering others is adverse to my way of thinking. I will take risks on my own but NOT when it endangers others.

That is what makes the difference between a True Adventurer and a self centered, self serving, inconsiderate slob.

Is that to the point that you NOW understand my concern?


83 posted on 06/14/2012 9:56:51 PM PDT by jongaltsr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: DariusBane

I said NOTHING about outlawing anything. You did!

I can’t nor can anyone on this planet reduce risk to zero but we can take responsibility to help insure that we are not (or at least minimally) responsible for the death or injury of others by being actively aware of hazards instead of just willy nilly going about life with no consideration of others.

People who do not consider the safety of others and only think and act on their own pleasures, should be controlled, regulated or even placed in a padded room.

If one in unconcerned about anyone but themselves they are a danger to the general public and should be controlled until they grow up and adequately become responsible to humanity and other forms of life.

I pity those that feel no consideration to people (and other form of life or property) other then for their own selfish, self centered desires.


84 posted on 06/14/2012 10:12:09 PM PDT by jongaltsr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: DariusBane

I said NOTHING about outlawing anything.

I can’t, nor can anyone on this planet reduce risk to zero but we can take responsibility to help insure that we are not (or at least minimally) responsible for the death or injury of others by being actively aware of hazards instead of just willy nilly going about life with no consideration of others.

People who do not consider the safety of others and only think and act on their own pleasures, should be controlled, regulated or even placed in a padded room.

If one in unconcerned about anyone but themselves they are a danger to the general public and should be controlled until they grow up and adequately become responsible to humanity and other forms of life.

I pity those that feel no consideration to people (and other form of life or property) other then for their own selfish, self centered desires.

I AM NOT ADVERSE TO CHALLENGES AND RISK TAKING.

But taking and endangering others is adverse to my way of thinking. I will take risks on my own but NOT when it endangers others.

That is what makes the difference between a True Adventurer and a self centered, self serving, inconsiderate slob.

Is that to the point that you NOW understand my concern?

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies


85 posted on 06/14/2012 10:17:34 PM PDT by jongaltsr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson