  |
Notice that the original proposal for a lengthy waiting period after the last homosexual "encounter" is now absent, and "how" homos engage in their behavior is now the focus.
What will it take for America to stand up to the gaystapo? Perhaps when the govt mandates gay relationships upon straight people?
Oh okay NOW I support 0bamacare. /s LOL! What is with the Democrat’s OBSESSION with 2% of the population?
I lost two good friends to the Great Hemophiliac Genocide of the late 80’s, early 90’s, due to AIDS-tainted blood.
Around 200,000 Americans died because of this, but because the queers are a protected political class, that votes Democrat and runs much of today's media, it's just too politically-incorrect to talk about, OR EVEN MENTION
Piercings are not allowed but this is. Unbelievable.
Piercings are not allowed but this is. Unbelievable.
Isn’t all donated blood tested for HIV?
If the Homo’s can give blood why can’t the Cancer patients?
I never heard of anyone contracting Cancer from a transfusion.
Pray that the next administration and congress will have the plain common sense and sanity to undo all of these proposals, but I have exactly ZERO faith in Romney doing so.
It was just this morning that my local blood bank emailed asking me to schedule another donation. I think that I’ll ask them what their plans are to counter this.
If homos are allowed to contaminate the pool then I will stop donating - and I’m a 2-gallon guy.
How the hell does an unelected bureaucrat have so much power?
Years ago, in my Crusading Reporter days, did a story on this issue.
The leading advocate of No Donations - Ever for gay men was an openly gay physician who said he wanted to be able to donate blood, but knew that to do so would endanger the entire blood supply.
At least 400 Canadians died from tained blood from the Arkansas prisons when Slick was Gov there.
How many more have to die for another feel good, suicidal social experiment?
|
I was just thinking about this topic the other day and realized that the policy will *have* to change based on the political climate. You can’t continue with a platform of “being homosexual is just fine and normal” when active gay men aren’t allowed to give blood - because it requires the “why” question.
Now we have politicians risking our health because of gay activists. We need to cite the health statistics - loud and clear.
It only stands to reason that when 2% of the population is having (mostly) promiscuous sex with that same 2%, any time a disease is introduced into that population it will spread at a much greater speed than in the rest (98%) of the population. I have gay friends that complain about the lack of monogamy with gay men, they just don’t see the connection at all (to health vs. rest of population, they just deny it).
That is a great dea!! Homos and bisexuals can donate blood to each other, just not to those of us who think this is absolutely STUPID!!!
There is no such thing as a low risk homosexual. The whole point of the lifestyle is extreme high risk behavior anytime, anywhere, with anyone.
That also is why there is no such thing as a monogamous homosexual. Gay monogamy is nothing like a normal monogamous husband-wife marriage. No married guy I know gets Thursday nights “off”.