Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Applaud HHS Study That May Allow 'Low-Risk' Homosexuals to Donate Blood [Mega-Barf]
cnsnews.com ^ | June 14, 2012 | Penny Starr

Posted on 06/14/2012 9:48:20 AM PDT by fwdude

(CNSNews.com) – Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) sent a letter signed by 62 other Democrats to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, supporting her agency's review of the policy that bans homosexual and bisexual men from donating blood.

The Democrats say the ban is “outdated,” and they called the HHS pilot study an important step in "assessing the feasibility of allowing healthy gay and bisexual men to donate blood while maintaining the safety of our blood supply."

“Patients across the country desperately need life-saving blood transfusions, yet perfectly healthy would-be donors are turned away based solely on sexual orientation,” Quigley said.

“Equality for the LGBT community is closer than ever but outdated and discriminatory policies like this must evolve to match advancements in science and technology.”

“We’ve been working on this a long time, and I applaud Secretary Sebelius for taking this important step toward ending the lifetime ban on gay men donating blood, and instead relying on the science of today, not the myths of twenty years ago,” Kerry said. “I’m confident that the findings of these new studies will pave the way to get this policy off the books.

The lawmakers said the study will at least provide an "informed evaluation" of what it will take to end the ban on homosexuals donating blood. Currently, any man who has had sex with another man since 1977 is banned for life from donating blood.

The HHS pilot study will look at alternative criteria for deferring donations from men who have sex with men.

In their letter, Kerry and Quigley asked HHS to explore ways of distinguishing "high-risk" homosexuals from "low-risk" homosexuals.

"For instance, the donor questionnaire could collect information on whether or not the donor is in a monogamous relationship or if the donor engages in effective preventive measures," the wrote. "In this way the donor questionnaire could assess the risk level of all potential donors, regardless of sexual orientation."

They also urged HHS to "be vigilant" in avoiding any "real or perceived unwarranted discriminatory treatment" of homosexuals in the process of conducting the pilot study.

This is the second letter Kerry and Quigley have sent to Sebelius urging a policy change on homosexual blood donors. The first was sent in June 2010.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; bloodsupply; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; kenyanbornmuzzie; samesexmarriage; swrdswllwngsdshw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: Wolverine

Kerry and every d-Rat who signed this letter should be forced to have blood from just such sexually-active homosexuals that they deem “low risk” injected into them before anything like this goes through. I’d like to see how many of them would retract their support.


61 posted on 06/14/2012 11:43:58 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
18 gallons is impressive. 144 pints. As an 8-gallon donor, it will take me at least 12 or 13 years to get to that level...and no one can be sure of being alive and well 13 years in the future.

I remember the story on the news right after 9/11 showing Yasser Arafat ostentatiously donating blood in supposed solidarity with the victims of the attacks. Presumably they dumped his blood once the cameras were gone.

62 posted on 06/14/2012 11:44:33 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

At least 400 Canadians died from tained blood from the Arkansas prisons when Slick was Gov there.

 

THE STORY OF A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
SUBSECTION: TAINTED BLOOD
Revised 1/8/01

TAINTED BLOOD SCANDAL

http://alamo-girl.com/0332.htm


Clinton & the killer blood
Articles from the Progressive Review
http://prorev.com/blood.htm

16_COVER.jpg

Bloody awful 

How money and politics contaminated Arkansas's prison plasma program.


63 posted on 06/14/2012 11:45:19 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Raebie

According to the CDC it can take up to 6 months for the disease to progress to the point its detectable using current tests. At that point the test is apparently 99% accurate.


64 posted on 06/14/2012 12:02:06 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

I couldn’t agree more. He would probably show the same level of courage as he did when he stabbed American soldiers in the back. There are few people who I hold in lower regard than Kerry.


65 posted on 06/14/2012 12:32:25 PM PDT by Freestate316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

That is a great dea!! Homos and bisexuals can donate blood to each other, just not to those of us who think this is absolutely STUPID!!!


66 posted on 06/14/2012 12:59:11 PM PDT by jch10 (BO, Leaker-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I donate to the Red Cross three or four times a year. Every time I sit down at the K of C (where the Blood mobile arrives) I am asked to read through the do’s and don’ts, which include a prohibition on donating if male to male sex contact has occurred in my life.
67 posted on 06/14/2012 1:35:09 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

There is no such thing as a low risk homosexual. The whole point of the lifestyle is extreme high risk behavior anytime, anywhere, with anyone.

That also is why there is no such thing as a monogamous homosexual. Gay monogamy is nothing like a normal monogamous husband-wife marriage. No married guy I know gets Thursday nights “off”.


68 posted on 06/14/2012 6:24:32 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: married21

If it was only to each other it’d be fine. But that’s not what it is.


69 posted on 06/14/2012 6:25:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson