Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AFL-CIO Pulling Funds From Obama Campaign
U.S. News & World Report ^ | Wednesday, June 13, 2012 | Elizabeth Flock

Posted on 06/13/2012 10:35:25 AM PDT by kristinn

The AFL-CIO has told Washington Whispers it will redeploy funds away from political candidates smack dab in the middle of election season, the latest sign that the largest federation of unions in the country could be becoming increasingly disillusioned with President Obama.

The federation says the shift has been in the works for months, and had nothing to do with the president's failure to show in Wisconsin last week, where labor unions led a failed recall election of Governor Scott Walker.

"We wanted to start investing our funds in our own infrastructure and advocacy," AFL-CIO spokesman Josh Goldstein told Whispers. "There will be less contributions to candidates," including President Obama.

While there were "a lot of different opinions" about whether Obama should have gone to Wisconsin, according to Goldstein, "this is not a slight at the president."

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; aflcio; democrats; elections; nobama2012; obama; trumka
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Lazamataz

The DNC views things like “rules” and “votes” and “procedure” to be charming and old-fashioned.

If they feel threatened, the DNC resorts to “courts” and “birth-certificates” or even “Fort Marcy Park”

Ask Senator Lautenberg.

It wouldn’t be difficult, for those without scruples, to get Hillary Clinton on the ballot


41 posted on 06/13/2012 12:36:04 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MCOAvalanche
I’m wondering if this was a chesspiece type move to get funds available to support/persuade hillary to run.

Bringing Hillary in to "rescue" the party and ticket, will smack of complete desperation, and desperation is not a winner in most battles.

At best, Hillary will swap places with Biden, but, it will still seem as a desperate move, and not really change anything, since, Obama is not one to share power at the top.
42 posted on 06/13/2012 12:38:34 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I am not sure, but they’ve done it before in state races. Really nothing is official until the convention. I suppose if he were pressured to drop out there would have to be someone run, and I am sure the Dems would put on a fun charade to show a huge momentum building to have Hillary run.

Frankly, I am not sure the people would care...they have soundly rejected the Democrats at all levels, and she’s not all that compelling to change that trajectory. Seeing Carville, Bill, and other Clintonites all suddenly becoming anti-Barrack is certainly raising an eyebrow, though.


43 posted on 06/13/2012 2:31:13 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Freestate316

Well the original plan was 2008 but that went out the window. Bill hasn’t forgotten the race card being played on him and won’t forgive. So we see L Davis, Rendell, H Ford Carvile and Bill killing Obama.

2016 is the only game in town for HC.


44 posted on 06/13/2012 5:21:21 PM PDT by Leto (Damn shame Sarah didn't run the Presidency was there for the taking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson