Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tzar

Yes. It’s an Act, not an Amendment. It is not constitutional. Republicans can be wrong too.


141 posted on 06/11/2012 7:21:43 PM PDT by YankeeDoodleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: YankeeDoodleRebel

and yet again you have shown your ignorance.

If you think the founding fathers wanted queers to marry then you need to check yourself in.
As for you wanting special rights then go ahead and get a constitutional amendment and see how that goes for your agenda, ARF


246 posted on 06/13/2012 5:43:03 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson