Well, that’s an interesting spin... attributing the abuse problem in previous generations to experiences in WWII. I have known in my life many WWII veterans, combat and not, and not one of them has raised a hand to his wife. The fact it was “accepted behavior” in some quarters doesn’t legitimize it, just as the concept of homosexual “marriage” bears no greater legitimacy than it did in the 1950s.
You’re giving rationale to this type of behavior, regardless of how you might try to express it. That type of approach to marital resolution would be more welcome in a hellhole like Pakistan.
No I am not. I am reviewing the development of the law from a half-century ago to now and specifically attempting to disprove your statement about "men". That's it. I said nothing about other countries, nor Pakistan, nor homos for that matter. Specifically about your comment about men.
It doesn't matter whether you nor I have any knowledge of abuse surrounding the specific WWII veterans we have known in the past. It is the only fundamental demographic of men upon which the laws of change have been built.