Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glenn Beck Just Signed A New Contract For $100 Million
Business Insider ^ | 06/11/2012 | Jim Edwards

Posted on 06/11/2012 12:35:40 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Glenn Beck once said that leaving Fox News Channel, as he did in 2011, would earn him $40 million by allowing him to concentrate on his own web-based subscriber operation, GBTV.

Now The New York Times reports he has signed a $100 million contract for his radio shows to appear on Clear Channel Communications stations across the country.

The move puts the pressure on Rush Limbaugh, whose advertisers abandoned him earlier this year after he called a college student a "slut" because she supported contraception coverage in healthcare plans. The Times said:

Now carried by more than 400 stations, the show typically ranks No. 3 among all news-talk radio shows, behind Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, so the contract extension brings a measure of stability to local stations that carry it.

Limbaugh's contract is worth $200 million per year. Beck's is worth $100 million over five years.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beck; glennbeck; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: SeekAndFind
I would hope that all this money is going to candidates, like they encourage us all to do.....

you got to watch Beck...he is constantly on the prowl to get your money...he sells everything....

81 posted on 06/11/2012 3:59:49 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Ten Percent. They’ll bill him.


82 posted on 06/11/2012 4:00:23 PM PDT by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Beck has upped his hype IMO....for ratings???


83 posted on 06/11/2012 4:01:07 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: svcw

You feel the same about Israelis that are not Christians as you do about LDSers.


84 posted on 06/11/2012 4:01:38 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I trust Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney, Cain, Perry, Bachman : I trust their judgment on their 2012 pick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
a number of failed Catholics who can not abide by Catholic teaching often grab at another religion...Mormonism happened to be there, what with all its whistles and bells and pretty people.....

no religion on earth ranks wealth higher on the godliness scale than Mormonism...

I say that along with saying I'm voting for Romney no matter what his religion...

85 posted on 06/11/2012 4:06:40 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Read my statement, God gave us free will to either accept or reject His Word.
If you have a problem with Him giving us such Grace, that we may dwell with Him for eternity, take it up with Him.


86 posted on 06/11/2012 4:09:23 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Just curious, is GBTV successful? Wonder if it is working out. Anyone know?


87 posted on 06/11/2012 4:27:11 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Actually, Rush was virtually unaffected by the controversy.


88 posted on 06/11/2012 5:14:33 PM PDT by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

And then there was the show where he tried to push the Mormon myth that American Indians descended from the Jews and were visited by Christ, and buried some kind of plates somewhere, or something. He jumped the shark bigtime with that one.


89 posted on 06/11/2012 5:40:01 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Cat, don’t you think that makes the statement by a couple of people on this thread that Beck isn’t a mormon at all, really humorous?


90 posted on 06/11/2012 7:09:03 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Anyone that would leave the church that Christ himself founded to join a cult started a drunk named Joe Smith, who the cult’s members say sit at the right hand of God; well they ain’t wrapped too tight. And that describes the comedian Glenn Beck.


91 posted on 06/11/2012 9:02:27 PM PDT by NKP_Vet (creep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Not only the right hand of God Himself, but decides if you are worthy to get into their highest level of celestial being.
JS once said he was greater that their lds jesus.
You are correct, not wrapped to tight.
GB has begun to lose it, however he apparently has an audience, mostly 13 year olds I would think at this point.
Years ago I thought he was great, I am guessing five years ago..........down hill.


92 posted on 06/11/2012 10:08:34 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: svcw
"Cat, don’t you think that makes the statement by a couple of people on this thread that Beck isn’t a mormon at all, really humorous?"

I do, considering that he's talked about being a Mormon many, many times. His conversion story, told by him, is readily available on YouTube, and there's this, too....

http://bakersfieldchurch.blogspot.com/2010/08/glenn-becks-mormon-infomercial.html

93 posted on 06/12/2012 8:19:48 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: svcw

http://bakersfieldchurch.blogspot.com/2010/08/glenn-becks-mormon-infomercial.html


94 posted on 06/12/2012 8:20:38 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

It’s very sad. Beck has proven that he will dig to any depth to uncover information, but that doesn’t extend to Mormonism. I suspect that his sidekick, Pat Gray, who had a hand in his conversion, sticks close by to make sure no one puts a doubt in Beck’s head.


95 posted on 06/12/2012 8:23:16 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

When Glenn used the Decalogue Stones from an Ohio archeological dig to try and ‘prove the existence of Jewish writing in prehistoric America’ I posted extensive debunking of this lie. But it didn’t seem of interest at the time on FR. The stones are dated to no older than the 1300s and the place where they were fashioned is even posited and most likely correct since a ‘factory’ for fabricating them was known to that time.


96 posted on 06/12/2012 8:29:18 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

I knew Beck had started talking about bogus lds history, yet never realize to that extent.
How very sad, looks like he has fallen hook line and sinker.


97 posted on 06/12/2012 8:35:41 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
The following link is a pretty good explanation of the Ohio Decalogue Stones. I tend to agree with the female archaeologist who is cited midway in the article. Glenn Beck, of course, jumped too soon, to air the specious claims of MormonISM teachers, one of whom is listed on Google when you google the name Decalogue Stones. MormonISM was founded by a lying conman sexual predator of married women and is maintained by a fabric of lies which must be updated periodically, like with the false teaching on the stones.

http://www.jhmuseum.org/holy_stone_about.htm

98 posted on 06/12/2012 8:46:56 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

Comment #99 Removed by Moderator

To: CatherineofAragon
Here is a more in depth explanation of the stones and their authenticity, dated to the medieval period, not prehistoric America:

Dr. Rochelle Altman, a specialist in ancient phonetic-based writing systems, maintains that the Newark Holy Stones are indeed genuine. In her discussion of this topic she notes that “Dr. Arnold Fischel, lecturer at the Sephardic synagogue in New York (founded in 1654, thus with a Sephardic-Dutch connection), a noted scholar and authority, had written a paper, ‘The Hebrew Inscribed Stones Found in Ohio,’ delivered in June of 1861 to The American Ethnological Society. In this paper, he stated he was convinced of the authenticity of the artifact and ascribed it to ‘medieval and European origins’.”

Dr. Altman notes that the 1863 report of a committee set up by the Ethnological Society agreed with Dr. Fischel’s conclusions; nonetheless, this report has been ignored by the archaeological world. She writes, “Why was the identification ignored? Because neither the committee’s report nor Fischel’s identification fit the two models erected with regard to these artifacts. On one side, we had a group who maintained that the artifacts were evidence of the presence of the ten lost tribes of Israel in ‘Ancient America.’ On the other side, we had a school who declared the artifacts were ‘modern forgeries.’” Dr. Altman then presents a new and novel explanation of what the five Newark Holy Stones really are.

“There are five pieces, four of which compose a set of ritual artifacts of two types. The fifth item is a case, made-to-order, to house one of the ritual artifacts. The two types are intended for different purposes.

“Type one consists of head (‘rosh’) [which Dr. Altman identifies as the Johnson-Bradner Stone] and hand (‘yad’) phylacteries (tefillin), made of black limestone (black is required for phylacteries). The hand phylactery is 6-7/8” in length by 2-7/8” in width by 1-3/4” in thickness.

“The artifact [the Decalogue Stone] is inscribed in the incantation format and displays a variant of a known condensed version of the ‘decalogue,’ with abbreviations and composite graphs that dates to before the second century BCE. The head phylactery, inscribed with two of the four excerpts of Exodus required by halacha (Laws), is also written in the spirals of an incantation format and is also made of black limestone. Now only a lithograph of the head piece remains. The phylactery was approximately 3” long by 1-3/4” in thickness and tapered from approximately 1” at the top to a rounded “point” at the bottom.

“Type two, made of novaculite, a very hard fine-grained rock, consists of a flow detector [the Keystone], for determining whether water is stagnant or flowing (thus pure), and a bowl for containing the water for ritual purification prior to donning the phylacteries. The flow detector is four-sided and approximately 6” in length by 1-5/8” in thickness and bears a resemblance to a rounded ‘plumb bob.’” Dr. Altman analyzes each of the Holy Stones and the writings on them. In part she writes, “The two phylacteries are made of black material, which is in accord with the rabbinical law that phylacteries must be black in color. Although contrary to Palestinian and Babylonian rabbinic rulings in the second century CE, the use of a condensed ‘decalogue’ is in accord with a known prior tradition. That other traditions continued to exist alongside the Palestinian and Babylonian tradition is known from the Dead Sea Scrolls, papyri from Egypt.”

Based on her analysis she comes to the following conclusions:
“The artifacts could not possibly have been created in the nineteenth century; nobody had the knowledge necessary to do so. Indeed, nobody who previously examined these artifacts has recognized that two of the artifacts are inscribed in the ancient incantation format. Nor has anyone previously realized that the ‘peculiar’ font is a consolidated design or that it is a grid font typical of scripts and fonts used with incantation formats. It is rather clear that no one until today has recognized the Late-Medieval Hebrew script that is the base-script of this consolidated grid font. The ‘Newark’ Ritual artifacts are neither forgeries nor relics of ‘Ancient America.’ They are, however, very important concrete evidence of Ancient and Medieval Israelite practices.”

I sent the information on the stones to Glenn but it is doubtful that it was allowed to be presented to him. He has a very 'protective' staff who appear to be dedicated to aiming him in the directions they want him to go.

The above passage is from the following link, if anyone wishes to dig deeper into this issue:
http://personal.stevens.edu/~llevine/holy_stones_newark_ohio.pdf

100 posted on 06/12/2012 9:08:26 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson