Replies

What has haunted me since a case I can't remember but Zippo's lawyer stated "revealing the BC would be embarrassing to the Prez." That argument has died out but what if Zippo said in this secret meeting, "My real name is Barry Shabazz. My father is MX and my mother is...and I was adopted by the Dunhams so that is why I have this funky BC in HI...bla bla bla.? But because I was born in NY to citizen parents I am eligible. Because adoptions are confidential I do not wish this information become public.....

The other thing I remember him saying but, have never been able to find it since, is "We have the law on our side." When asked about his eligibility sometime in '08

Obama’s Birth Certificate a “serious embarrassment” Source?
All the News that Fits ^ | 10/22/08 | Nancy

Posted on Thursday, 23 October 2008 8:11:53 AM by pissant

Barack Obama claims “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation” in the Berg case and has filed a request for dismissal and a protective order. Berg’s filing asks for copies of his birth certificate, citizenship records, passport and travel records, and other documentation proving citizenship in the U.S. as well as other countries.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2112521/posts?page=57

Warning: The Justia site froze my comp.

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/24/

Greg, a bona fide moonbat Obot troll and I once had a discussion on the Lakin case and the use of the term “embarrassment”. I don’t know if you can trust an Obot, but fwiw, here is what he wrote to me:

‘I don’t know if you actually read what Judge Lind wrote but here’s the exact quote in context. Judge Lind was discussing the legal concept of “political question” which involves whether a court has the license to rule on an political issue or not. She was NOT discussing any “embarrassment” to Barack Obama.

She said: “The potential for embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question are uniquely powerful to ensure that courts-martial do not become the vehicle for adjudicating the legality of political decisions and to ensure the military’s capacity to maintain good order and discipline in the armed forces.”

Her statement had absolutely NOTHING to do with embarrassing Obama. She is talking about various branches of the government stepping on each other’s toes and overstepping their jurisdictions in issuing rulings on questions that are solely political.

Judge Lind was using the word “embarrasment” in a LEGAL context. The following definition is best applied:
“embarrassment” - extreme excess; “an embarrassment of riches”
overplus, plethora, superfluity
excessiveness, inordinateness, excess - immoderation as a consequence of going beyond sufficient or permitted limits
redundance, redundancy - the attribute of being superfluous and unneeded; “the use of industrial robots created redundancy among workers”’

[Me again] Take it fwiw. My only inclination to believe, in this one case, an actual Obot troll [since zotted] is that he seems to cite the judge’s quote correctly. I know many sites quoted her differently, but there was never a link to the actual testimony. The above doesn’t have a link either, but I investigated it at the time and found the quote to be accurate. Again, fwiw.

“Upon close examination of the evidence,” Arpaio states, “it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama’s long-form birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number.”

No need for bogus SSN#(s) if his papers (adoption) are legal.

Or Obama is a NBC who is a common criminal stealing SSN#'s for his conman-grifter lifestyle.