So you’d rather have four more years of Eric Holder and allow a neo-communist to pack our courts with like-minded uberlefties all in the name of conservative party purity? Well done, Comrade. Well done.
That's the context of a vacuum. You think the limited government conservatives who will probably be sweeping Congress will just lie down and roll over? You think moderate Republicans in Congress would raise their hands in surrender, too? You think Obama and his crew are omnipotent?
If you're going to play the "so you'd rather have" game, so YOU would rather have the most powerful Republican in America be a person with a distinguished record of actively ADVANCING five major liberal agendas, including activist judicial picks, the environmentalist agenda, abortion, homosexual "rights," and state-run health care?
You think it isn't loopy to vote FOR that and give him a Congress where his own guys would be split -- moderates vs conservatives -- and the moderates would have support from the OTHER side of the aisle, and they'd be able to say their Republican president had a "mandate" and that the conservatives were really just the minority of the people's will? Essentially making any pretence of the Republican party as being a valid opposer of bigger government, ridiculous?
Well done, Rover. Roll over.
Holder and the Tyrant ARE ONLY in Office
because of Backstabber Romney and his Legion of Backstabbers.
Holder and the Tyrant ARE ONLY in Office
because of Backstabber Romney and his Legion of Backstabbers.