This is a retread of a CNN video from the day before they released the long-form birth certificate. In the original version, Tuchman showed the OLD short-form as the “computer generated” document and the narrator said it was made public 3 years ago. Now, a year along, they edited it and added in that fake-looking computer-generated long form copy that looks like the Nordyke versions, but which doesn’t have Obama’s data on it. And then the voice over lies and says it was made public 4 years ago. As usual, they blur the image so you can’t prove that it’s not his. But it’s not. Here’s a link to the YouTube video from last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spvIlVppRts View it and save it before it’s scrubbed.
Wow.
I really is. Amazing. They are retreading this as new.
Like the original Laughable Fake Birth Certificate (LFBC) this retreading is a statement of arrogance.
They re-ran this story to try to pre-empt what everybody needs to realize: that Alvin Onaka just indirectly confirmed to AZ SOS Ken Bennett - and the whole world - that the record they have for Obama is not legally valid.
That means that both the COLB and the long-form are AGAIN indirectly confirmed as forgeries, to deceive the whole world about the validity of his record.
The reason they had to talk to Fukino in this clip and not to Onaka, for instance - who also saw the birth certificate even though he had no “tangible interest” (which Fukino claimed she had because she had been asked by Lingle’s press secretary to make an announcement about the eligibility controversy) - is because Onaka would be criminally liable for perjury if he stated that he was absolutely sure that Obama was born in Hawaii, since he still holds an official position with the HI government. The only way that scummy Fukino is going to stay out of jail for perjuring herself in this clip is by pleading that she was not speaking as the Health Director but as a normal citizen who can lie out the wazoo with impunity.
I see stuff like this and it makes me so angry that these people have a big megaphone as if anything about them was credible.
This guy totally blew off that Abercrombie didn’t release a BC because he couldn’t FIND ONE - according to what he told Mike Evans. He also told Evans that the first time he ever saw Barry was at t-ball age. He told a Star-Advertiser columnist that there was something “actually written down” but that it wouldn’t convince skeptics, which is why this was going to be a serious issue for the 2012 election.
And why didn’t the “reporter” (cough) ask Fukino why she had said that Obama’s BC was half-written and half-typed, why she referred to plural “vital records”, or why her own office had indirectly confirmed that Obama’s BC was amended in late 2006 or early January of 2007?
Why didn’t they talk to former OIP Director, Paul Tsukiyama - who indirectly confirmed that there are affidavits submitted in support of the claims on Obama’s birth certificate?
Why didn’t CNN mention that they flew in Stig Waidelich to do this segment, and that they were required to either present a reason that they neeeded an emergency BC released, or else wait a week before getting a COLB for him? Which did they do - claim an emergency, or wait a week? Or had CNN pre-arranged what the HDOH was going to do, since the BC# they gave Stig on that COLB is hopelessly out of sequence with the Nordyke BC#’s and Obama’s?
Geez, it makes me angry to see the ignorance out there and the way that the Soros people are trying to silence those of us who have the facts that prove them wrong.
This is why I don’t watch TV or take a newspaper. Just makes me too angry and disgusted.