If you can’t argue with the facts, you call names. Sound familiar? I didn’t start anything, I objected to Zimmerman being labeled a hero. He’s not.
Now you're escalating the fight you started in the first place.
-- I objected to Zimmerman being labeled a hero. --
You even admit you started it. You had no need to make that remark, yet you made it. You started this.
My remarks to you are no more unfair than yours toward Zimmerman.
You assigned him as the cause, as though some part or parts of his action wasn't justified.
"a wanna be cop who caused a tragedy," that's your label for Zimmerman.
And, as you blame Zimmerman for events going awry on February 26th, I'm blaming you for the fact that you and I won't be getting along well. Fair enough for you, fair enough for me.
BTW, neither Tom Robinson nor George Zimmerman were heroes. They were normal people going about the business of their life. Tom was helping Mayella. George was helping the neighborhood. Both were framed for crimes they did not commit, and both were judged by people with an agenda rather than by evidence. That was my point.
If you’re not familiar with the evidence - if you’ve only accepted the word and bias of the racist media - then you wouldn’t see what really happened. And isn’t that the point? If all anybody ever heard was Bob Ewell’s account, then everybody would think that Tom was guilty. If all you’ve heard is Bob Ewell’s account - and by that I mean a media that has altered tapes and tampered with witnesses in order to frame Zimmerman - then you are the equivalent of the Cunninghams, who were no way gonna listen to the word of a black man over a white man. They knew who was guilty before they even thought about the evidence that proved their conclusions wrong.
Answer this: When did Trayvon circle Zimmerman’s truck and confront Zimmerman, to the point that Zimmerman rolled up his window out of fear for what Trayvon was going to do? What does the evidence say? When did that happen? What have you heard about that?