I’m not going to discuss the evidence with you right now. I find you to be an unreasonable crank. We come to opposite conclusions on the same evidence. Obviously, there is something different between how the two of us get from evidence to conclusion, but I really don’t care what you think; and I assume you don’t care what I think. IOW, neither one of us will be persuaded by the other.
btw, I have not come to any conclusion. I offered an alternative theory based on the same facts. I asked you to support your conclusion with facts and you have acknowledged that you can't.