Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil

In GA both Obama and his attorney showed contempt for the court after they ignored Judge Michael Malihi’s order to appear in court.

The response? Crickets. Right after the judge ruled Obama eligible to be on the ballot on the basis of ZERO - no - evidence. A sharia ruling based on “judge’s knowledge”, apparently.

Why no contempt charges? IIRC, the judge refused to certify the court record so it could go to another judge to have contempt charges decided.

And on the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot, the superior (cough) court ruled him eligible before their clerk even allowed the plaintiffs to file any motions. The case was literally decided before it was even filed.

That’s what we call a “show trial”. It’s supposed to not be done in this great, lawful, “equal protection” country we’ve got here. Then again, this country is under a foreign enemy combatant, and he has filled the position of Attorney General with a man whose sole job is to make sure that the judicial system DOESN’T administer justice.


192 posted on 06/02/2012 8:17:33 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
Then again, this country is under a foreign enemy combatant, and he has filled the position of Attorney General with a man whose sole job is to make sure that the judicial system DOESN’T administer justice.

You're just saying that because it's true...

195 posted on 06/02/2012 9:23:12 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson